M. Reid, J. Brooks
{"title":"Detecting effects of environmental water allocations in wetlands of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia","authors":"M. Reid, J. Brooks","doi":"10.1002/1099-1646(200009/10)16:5<479::AID-RRR599>3.0.CO;2-Y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"River regulation has significantly altered the hydrology and ecology of floodplain wetlands throughout the Murray‐Darling Basin, Australia. Management plans proposed for rivers in the Murray‐Darling Basin incorporate ‘environmental water allocations’ (EWAs) designed to redress some of the damage caused by regulation, via partial restoration of the natural hydrological regime that used to be experienced by associated floodplain wetlands. Monitoring and scientifically rigorous adaptive management practices are the key to the long-term success of EWAs, and successful monitoring relies on the well-informed selection of a variety of hydrologically sensitive indicators. In this paper, we recommend a range of physical, chemical and biological indicators for use for monitoring change in wetland health in response to EWAs. Physical and chemical variables suggested include wetland depth, wetland area and salinity. Aquatic macrophytes and macroinvertebrates are recommended as the primary biological indicators for monitoring change within the Murray‐Darling Basin, although the indicator potential of macroinvertebrates still has to be confirmed by planned and ongoing research. Information is also presented for a variety of other components of wetland ecosystems, including biofilms, zooplankton, birds, fish, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and fringing vegetation. Our current knowledge of the relationships of these variables with wetland hydrology and ecosystem health is relatively limited. Further research is required to investigate the nature of these relationships and determine the utility of these parameters as indicators within wetlands of the Murray‐Darling Basin. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"79","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1646(200009/10)16:5<479::AID-RRR599>3.0.CO;2-Y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 79
澳大利亚墨累-达令盆地湿地环境水分配的检测效应
河流治理显著地改变了澳大利亚墨累—达令盆地洪泛区湿地的水文和生态。墨累—达令盆地的河流管理计划包括“环境水分配”(EWAs),旨在通过部分恢复相关洪泛平原湿地过去所经历的自然水文制度,来纠正监管造成的一些损害。监测和科学严格的适应性管理实践是环境评价长期成功的关键,而成功的监测依赖于对各种水文敏感指标的明智选择。在本文中,我们推荐了一系列物理、化学和生物指标,用于监测湿地健康变化对生态环境影响的响应。建议的物理和化学变量包括湿地深度、湿地面积和盐度。水生大型植物和大型无脊椎动物被推荐作为监测墨累—达令盆地变化的主要生物指标,尽管大型无脊椎动物的指示潜力仍需通过计划和正在进行的研究来证实。此外,还提供了湿地生态系统的各种其他组成部分的信息,包括生物膜、浮游动物、鸟类、鱼类、哺乳动物、爬行动物、两栖动物和边缘植被。我们目前对这些变量与湿地水文和生态系统健康之间关系的了解相对有限。需要进一步的研究来调查这些关系的性质,并确定这些参数在墨累—达令盆地湿地中作为指标的效用。版权所有©2000约翰威利父子有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。