Criteria of authentication of plagiarism in scientific literature to cybersecurity

Володимир Григорович Кононович, Микола Генріхович Романюков
{"title":"Criteria of authentication of plagiarism in scientific literature to cybersecurity","authors":"Володимир Григорович Кононович, Микола Генріхович Романюков","doi":"10.18372/2225-5036.25.14056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem of plagiarism in scientific and educational literature on informative and physical cybersecurity in the modern terms of passing to postindustrial society is important. The systems of cybersecurity became over difficult and computer-integrated. The theories of physical cybersecurity of cyberspace and industrial technologies require the development, and scientific developments are increases. Existent scientific and practical criteria of authentication of plagiarism, in a difference from rules procedures defence of commodity signs and copyright infringements, not to a full degree take into account the modern require-ments of laws on education and scientific activity, does not enable to take into account the features of concrete scientific direction for an analysis that estimations of plagiarism in publications  necessities  of scientific and technological knowledge dissatisfy, descendant new network nascent technologies. Unlike defence of commodity signs, while it is not mine-out rules, procedures that methods of exposure of plagiarism in scientific that to the educational sphere. On this basis, on the base of historical analysis of transformation of the basic going near defence of copyrights to the exposure of plagiarism, it is offered and adaptive approach is grounded to the construction of the system of criteria of authentication of plagiarism, based not on the formal coincidence of texts but on the coincidence of semantics. Coefficients of formal originality of texts can not be the measure of plagiarism, because plagia-rism is possible at any their values influence is Also considered on relations to plagiarism of scientific-technological revolution that to the transition to postindustrial society. Authors warn that resulted in given robot of suggestion, theses, the examples of the real materials are used can not be used as facts or grounds for prosecutions and for acceptance of organizational measures. Authors insist that all of it is used only for that, what this research did not grow into debatable.","PeriodicalId":350469,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Scientific Journal of Information Security","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Scientific Journal of Information Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18372/2225-5036.25.14056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem of plagiarism in scientific and educational literature on informative and physical cybersecurity in the modern terms of passing to postindustrial society is important. The systems of cybersecurity became over difficult and computer-integrated. The theories of physical cybersecurity of cyberspace and industrial technologies require the development, and scientific developments are increases. Existent scientific and practical criteria of authentication of plagiarism, in a difference from rules procedures defence of commodity signs and copyright infringements, not to a full degree take into account the modern require-ments of laws on education and scientific activity, does not enable to take into account the features of concrete scientific direction for an analysis that estimations of plagiarism in publications  necessities  of scientific and technological knowledge dissatisfy, descendant new network nascent technologies. Unlike defence of commodity signs, while it is not mine-out rules, procedures that methods of exposure of plagiarism in scientific that to the educational sphere. On this basis, on the base of historical analysis of transformation of the basic going near defence of copyrights to the exposure of plagiarism, it is offered and adaptive approach is grounded to the construction of the system of criteria of authentication of plagiarism, based not on the formal coincidence of texts but on the coincidence of semantics. Coefficients of formal originality of texts can not be the measure of plagiarism, because plagia-rism is possible at any their values influence is Also considered on relations to plagiarism of scientific-technological revolution that to the transition to postindustrial society. Authors warn that resulted in given robot of suggestion, theses, the examples of the real materials are used can not be used as facts or grounds for prosecutions and for acceptance of organizational measures. Authors insist that all of it is used only for that, what this research did not grow into debatable.
网络安全科学文献剽窃的鉴定标准
科学和教育文献中关于信息和物理网络安全的抄袭问题在现代传递到后工业社会是很重要的。网络安全系统变得过于复杂和计算机集成。网络空间物理网络安全理论和产业技术有待发展,科学水平不断提高。现有的科学和实践的剽窃鉴定标准,区别于商品标志和版权侵权的规则程序辩护,没有充分考虑到现代法律对教育和科学活动的要求,不能考虑到具体的科学方向的特点来分析对出版物中剽窃的估计是否符合科技知识的必要性。新网络新生技术的后裔。不同于商品标识的保护,虽然它不是挖矿规则,但程序表明,科学领域的抄袭行为暴露在教育领域。在此基础上,在对版权基本接近防卫向抄袭暴露转变的历史分析的基础上,提出了基于语义重合而非文本形式重合的剽窃鉴定标准体系构建的适应性思路。文本的形式原创性系数不能作为抄袭的衡量标准,因为抄袭在任何情况下都是可能的,它们的价值影响也要考虑到科技革命与抄袭的关系,以及与后工业社会过渡的关系。作者警告说,由于机器人的建议、论文、实例等真实材料的使用,不能作为起诉的事实或依据,也不能作为接受组织措施的依据。作者坚持认为,所有这些都只是为了这个目的,这项研究并没有引起争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信