Wonders beyond numbers: A brief history of all things mathematical, by Johnny Ball

L. McDonald
{"title":"Wonders beyond numbers: A brief history of all things mathematical, by Johnny Ball","authors":"L. McDonald","doi":"10.1080/17498430.2018.1504404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"reorienting toward research, while EliakimHastings Moore built an active department at Chicago, which was research-driven from the start. Batterson’s fourth and fifth chapters describe Osgood’s, Bôcher’s and Moore’s efforts to conduct and promote mathematical research in the USA, including the important role all three (especially Moore) played in the growth of the American Mathematical Society and the training of the next generation of Americanmathematical researchers. The remaining two chapters follow the development of the mathematics department at Princeton University in the first decade of the twentieth century, as well as the movement and accomplishments of George David Birkhoff and other freshly minted American mathematical researchers. The text’s institutional focus accounts for its emphasis on university presidents, especially Charles William Eliot at Harvard and Daniel Coit Gilman at Hopkins, but also William Rainey Harper at Chicago and Thomas Woodrow Wilson at Princeton. In Batterson’s discussion of the institutional landscape crafted by these men are glimpses of cultural considerations as well, both in terms of the broader cultural landscape of the Progressive Era United States and the more local cultures of mathematics departments themselves. The former is hinted at, for example, in Batterson’s mention of the public backlash in response to Gilman’s prioritization of advanced research and graduate education at Hopkins. And the latter is suggested by Batterson’s description of the ‘magic’ of Klein’s lectures at Göttingen (p 8) and the ‘magical environment’ created by Moore, Bolza, and Maschke at Chicago (p 169). Batterson’s book is smoothly written and well researched, drawing from over a dozen archival collections at almost a dozen different institutions. Included are appendices that show the 1849–50 Yale course catalogue as well as the 1905–06 list of graduate mathematics courses at Harvard and Chicago. Along with a handful of expository descriptions of important mathematical results, readers will find awell-crafted account of departments, careers, training and administration during a crucial period in American mathematics.","PeriodicalId":211442,"journal":{"name":"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17498430.2018.1504404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

reorienting toward research, while EliakimHastings Moore built an active department at Chicago, which was research-driven from the start. Batterson’s fourth and fifth chapters describe Osgood’s, Bôcher’s and Moore’s efforts to conduct and promote mathematical research in the USA, including the important role all three (especially Moore) played in the growth of the American Mathematical Society and the training of the next generation of Americanmathematical researchers. The remaining two chapters follow the development of the mathematics department at Princeton University in the first decade of the twentieth century, as well as the movement and accomplishments of George David Birkhoff and other freshly minted American mathematical researchers. The text’s institutional focus accounts for its emphasis on university presidents, especially Charles William Eliot at Harvard and Daniel Coit Gilman at Hopkins, but also William Rainey Harper at Chicago and Thomas Woodrow Wilson at Princeton. In Batterson’s discussion of the institutional landscape crafted by these men are glimpses of cultural considerations as well, both in terms of the broader cultural landscape of the Progressive Era United States and the more local cultures of mathematics departments themselves. The former is hinted at, for example, in Batterson’s mention of the public backlash in response to Gilman’s prioritization of advanced research and graduate education at Hopkins. And the latter is suggested by Batterson’s description of the ‘magic’ of Klein’s lectures at Göttingen (p 8) and the ‘magical environment’ created by Moore, Bolza, and Maschke at Chicago (p 169). Batterson’s book is smoothly written and well researched, drawing from over a dozen archival collections at almost a dozen different institutions. Included are appendices that show the 1849–50 Yale course catalogue as well as the 1905–06 list of graduate mathematics courses at Harvard and Chicago. Along with a handful of expository descriptions of important mathematical results, readers will find awell-crafted account of departments, careers, training and administration during a crucial period in American mathematics.
《超越数字的奇迹:数学简史》,约翰尼·鲍尔著
而EliakimHastings Moore则在芝加哥大学建立了一个活跃的部门,从一开始就以研究为导向。巴特森的第四章和第五章描述了奥斯古德、Bôcher和摩尔在美国开展和促进数学研究的努力,包括他们三人(尤其是摩尔)在美国数学学会的发展和下一代美国数学研究人员的培养中所起的重要作用。剩下的两章讲述了普林斯顿大学数学系在20世纪头十年的发展,以及乔治·大卫·伯克霍夫(George David Birkhoff)和其他新晋美国数学研究者的运动和成就。这本书对大学校长的关注,主要体现在哈佛大学的查尔斯·威廉·艾略特和霍普金斯大学的丹尼尔·科伊特·吉尔曼,以及芝加哥大学的威廉·雷尼·哈珀和普林斯顿大学的托马斯·伍德罗·威尔逊。在巴特森对这些人精心设计的制度景观的讨论中,也瞥见了文化方面的考虑,无论是在进步时代美国更广泛的文化景观方面,还是在数学系本身更局部的文化方面。例如,在巴特森提到公众对吉尔曼优先考虑霍普金斯大学的高级研究和研究生教育的强烈反对时,就暗示了前者。而后者则是由Batterson对Klein在Göttingen的讲座的“魔力”的描述(第8页)和摩尔、Bolza和Maschke在芝加哥创造的“神奇环境”(第169页)所暗示的。巴特森的书文笔流畅,研究深入,取材于十几个不同机构的十几份档案收藏。书的附录显示了1849-50年耶鲁大学的课程目录,以及1905-06年哈佛大学和芝加哥大学的研究生数学课程列表。除了对重要数学结果的少量说明性描述外,读者还将发现在美国数学的关键时期,对部门、职业、培训和管理的精心描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信