Dionysus between Sāsānian Iran and Roman allusions

R. Schulz
{"title":"Dionysus between Sāsānian Iran and Roman allusions","authors":"R. Schulz","doi":"10.15804/aoto201802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"lot can be said about religious notions in the late Roman Empire, but further to the east the picture is quite different. Until today even sketching the religious evolution within the Arsacid and the Sāsānian World remains problematic. A substantial amount of the most central Zoroastrian texts are incomplete and what we do find preserved is often mirrored through redaction after the Islamic conquest. About other central textual sources the only thing we know for a fact is that they existed. The situation with other cults not belonging to the Zoroastrian state church is even worse. Of course, this is also true when it comes to the interpretation of related archaeological material. Many of the themes we find depicted on toreutics, seals or stucco are hard to explain, while other representations are strongly reminiscent of cults known from the Roman World but somehow oddly adapted. In this contribution I will try to examine one of these cults — the worship of Dionysus. Since information about the Dionysian Cult in the east is quite scarce, it might prove useful to pay attention to a differentiation emphasized by Martha Carter. She stressed the difference between the term ‘Dionysian’, written with capital-D as related to the god, and ‘dionysian’ seen as a general mode to express a relation to wine or ecstatic behaviour, not necessarily connected to the cult of the god.1) For both terms we find comparable visual vocabulary, like scenes of vintage with erots or various animals between vine branches etc. In the specific case of the Late Roman beholder there likely was a connection between both perceptions, but the further east we go with an analysis the more difficult is to say what the actual content was. In Gandhāra and","PeriodicalId":240161,"journal":{"name":"Art of the Orient","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art of the Orient","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15804/aoto201802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

lot can be said about religious notions in the late Roman Empire, but further to the east the picture is quite different. Until today even sketching the religious evolution within the Arsacid and the Sāsānian World remains problematic. A substantial amount of the most central Zoroastrian texts are incomplete and what we do find preserved is often mirrored through redaction after the Islamic conquest. About other central textual sources the only thing we know for a fact is that they existed. The situation with other cults not belonging to the Zoroastrian state church is even worse. Of course, this is also true when it comes to the interpretation of related archaeological material. Many of the themes we find depicted on toreutics, seals or stucco are hard to explain, while other representations are strongly reminiscent of cults known from the Roman World but somehow oddly adapted. In this contribution I will try to examine one of these cults — the worship of Dionysus. Since information about the Dionysian Cult in the east is quite scarce, it might prove useful to pay attention to a differentiation emphasized by Martha Carter. She stressed the difference between the term ‘Dionysian’, written with capital-D as related to the god, and ‘dionysian’ seen as a general mode to express a relation to wine or ecstatic behaviour, not necessarily connected to the cult of the god.1) For both terms we find comparable visual vocabulary, like scenes of vintage with erots or various animals between vine branches etc. In the specific case of the Late Roman beholder there likely was a connection between both perceptions, but the further east we go with an analysis the more difficult is to say what the actual content was. In Gandhāra and
酒神介于Sāsānian伊朗和罗马典故之间
关于罗马帝国晚期的宗教观念,我们可以说很多,但再往东,情况就大不相同了。直到今天,即使是描绘阿萨西德和Sāsānian世界的宗教演变仍然存在问题。大量最核心的琐罗亚斯德教文本是不完整的,我们所发现的保存下来的通常是在伊斯兰征服后通过修订反映出来的。关于其他中心文本来源,我们唯一知道的事实是它们的存在。其他不属于琐罗亚斯德教国教的邪教的情况更糟。当然,当涉及到相关考古材料的解释时也是如此。我们在图腾、印章或灰泥上发现的许多主题都很难解释,而其他的表现则强烈地让人想起来自罗马世界的邪教,但不知何故被奇怪地改编了。在这篇文章中,我将试着考察其中的一种崇拜——对酒神的崇拜。由于关于东方酒神崇拜的信息相当稀少,注意玛莎·卡特所强调的区别可能是有用的。她强调了“酒神”和“酒神”之间的区别,“酒神”用大写字母d表示与神有关,而“酒神”被视为一种表达与酒或狂喜行为的一般模式,不一定与神的崇拜有关。1)对于这两个术语,我们发现了类似的视觉词汇,比如葡萄酒与erots或各种动物在葡萄树枝之间的场景等。在罗马晚期的观察者的具体案例中,这两种感知之间可能存在联系,但我们越往东分析,就越难以说出真正的内容是什么。在Gandhāra和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信