Texts with Various Levels of Hardness, Reading Comprehension and Reading Motivation: I+1 Versus I-1

Ehsan Namaziandost, F. Esfahani, Mehdi Nasri
{"title":"Texts with Various Levels of Hardness, Reading Comprehension and Reading Motivation: I+1 Versus I-1","authors":"Ehsan Namaziandost, F. Esfahani, Mehdi Nasri","doi":"10.15294/elt.v8i1.30992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the vital role of comprehensible input, this study attempted to compare the effects of input with various difficulty levels on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension and reading motivation. To fulfil this objective, 54 Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners were selected from two intact classes (n = 27 each). The selected participants were randomly assigned to two equal groups, namely “i+1” (n=27) and “i-1” group (n=27). Then, the groups were pretested by a researcher-made reading comprehension test. After carrying out the pre-test, the treatment (i.e., extensive reading at different levels of difficulty) was practiced on the both groups. The participants in “i+1” group received reading passages beyond the current level, on the other hand, the “i-1” group received those reading passages which were below their current level. After the instruction ended, a modified version of pre-test was conducted as posttest to determine the impacts of the treatment on the students’ reading comprehension. The obtained results indicated that there was a significant difference between the post-tests of “i+1” and “i-1” groups. The findings showed that the “i+1” group significantly outperformed the “i-1” group (p < .05) on the post-test. Moreover, the findings indicated that “i+1” group’s motivation increased after the treatment. The implications of the study suggest that interactive type of input is beneficial to develop students’ language skills. \nKeywords: Comprehensible Input; Extensive reading; Foreign language reading motivation; Input; Reading comprehension; Text difficulty level","PeriodicalId":395606,"journal":{"name":"ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v8i1.30992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Considering the vital role of comprehensible input, this study attempted to compare the effects of input with various difficulty levels on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension and reading motivation. To fulfil this objective, 54 Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners were selected from two intact classes (n = 27 each). The selected participants were randomly assigned to two equal groups, namely “i+1” (n=27) and “i-1” group (n=27). Then, the groups were pretested by a researcher-made reading comprehension test. After carrying out the pre-test, the treatment (i.e., extensive reading at different levels of difficulty) was practiced on the both groups. The participants in “i+1” group received reading passages beyond the current level, on the other hand, the “i-1” group received those reading passages which were below their current level. After the instruction ended, a modified version of pre-test was conducted as posttest to determine the impacts of the treatment on the students’ reading comprehension. The obtained results indicated that there was a significant difference between the post-tests of “i+1” and “i-1” groups. The findings showed that the “i+1” group significantly outperformed the “i-1” group (p < .05) on the post-test. Moreover, the findings indicated that “i+1” group’s motivation increased after the treatment. The implications of the study suggest that interactive type of input is beneficial to develop students’ language skills. Keywords: Comprehensible Input; Extensive reading; Foreign language reading motivation; Input; Reading comprehension; Text difficulty level
不同难度文本、阅读理解和阅读动机:I+1 vs I-1
考虑到可理解输入的重要作用,本研究试图比较不同难度输入对伊朗英语学习者阅读理解和阅读动机的影响。为了实现这一目标,从两个完整的班级(每个班级27人)中选择了54名伊朗中级英语学习者。被选中的参与者被随机分为两组,即“i+1”组(n=27)和“i-1”组(n=27)。然后,研究人员对这些小组进行了阅读理解测试。在完成前测后,对两组学生进行不同难度的泛读处理。“i+1”组收到的阅读文章超过了当前水平,而“i-1”组收到的阅读文章低于当前水平。在教学结束后,进行修改后的前测作为后测,以确定治疗对学生阅读理解的影响。得到的结果表明,“i+1”组和“i-1”组的后验有显著差异。结果显示,“i+1”组的后测成绩显著优于“i-1”组(p < 0.05)。此外,研究结果表明,“i+1”组的动机在治疗后有所增加。研究结果表明,互动式的语言输入有利于学生语言技能的培养。关键词:可理解输入;广泛的阅读;外语阅读动机;输入;阅读理解;文本难度等级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信