Intubation Biomarkers in COVID Critical Care Patients

D. Tatlısuluoğlu, G. Alay, G. Turan
{"title":"Intubation Biomarkers in COVID Critical Care Patients","authors":"D. Tatlısuluoğlu, G. Alay, G. Turan","doi":"10.4274/csmedj.galenos.2022.2021-12-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an important cause of mortality worldwide and has created a serious burden for intensive care units (ICU). Many biomarkers have been studied in terms of mortality and are used routinely. This study aims to look at the laboratory data of patients transferred to the intensive care as well as the laboratory data on the day of intubation to try to figure out which biomarkers can help predict the intubation procedure. Material and Methods: Patients in the COVID ICU had their records retrospectively reviewed. The study comprised patients who received oxygen therapy at the time of admission and had a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in the ICU, as well as patients who were endotracheal intubation after 24 h due to respiratory distress and/or other complications. Patients’ information was gleaned from the hospital’s computer database and patient files. The data of patients hospitalized in the COVID ICU were reviewed retrospectively. Patients who received oxygen therapythe firstirst admission with PCR test positive at ICU and patients who were intubated after 24 h due to respiratory distress and/or other accompanying reasons were included in the study. The data of the patients were obtained from the hospital computer database and patient files. Results: Lactate dehydrogenase, fibrinogen, ferritin, D-dimer, international normalized ratio (INR), WBC, neutrophil, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), I-granulocyte, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (p<0.001) and pro-C, urea, INR, hemoglobin, lymphocyte scores were compared when the patients were intubated upon admission. There was a statistically significant difference in the values (p<0.05). Conclusion: Acute phase reactants (AFR) increase in COVID-19 pneumonia. In the follow-up of the disease, it can be used in I-granulocytes with NLR as well as the increase in AFR. In this study, in addition to the increase in acute phase reactants compared to the laboratory data of intubated patients admitted to the intensive care unit, we found higher I-granulocyte and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio ratios.","PeriodicalId":366898,"journal":{"name":"Cam and Sakura Medical Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cam and Sakura Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/csmedj.galenos.2022.2021-12-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an important cause of mortality worldwide and has created a serious burden for intensive care units (ICU). Many biomarkers have been studied in terms of mortality and are used routinely. This study aims to look at the laboratory data of patients transferred to the intensive care as well as the laboratory data on the day of intubation to try to figure out which biomarkers can help predict the intubation procedure. Material and Methods: Patients in the COVID ICU had their records retrospectively reviewed. The study comprised patients who received oxygen therapy at the time of admission and had a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in the ICU, as well as patients who were endotracheal intubation after 24 h due to respiratory distress and/or other complications. Patients’ information was gleaned from the hospital’s computer database and patient files. The data of patients hospitalized in the COVID ICU were reviewed retrospectively. Patients who received oxygen therapythe firstirst admission with PCR test positive at ICU and patients who were intubated after 24 h due to respiratory distress and/or other accompanying reasons were included in the study. The data of the patients were obtained from the hospital computer database and patient files. Results: Lactate dehydrogenase, fibrinogen, ferritin, D-dimer, international normalized ratio (INR), WBC, neutrophil, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), I-granulocyte, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (p<0.001) and pro-C, urea, INR, hemoglobin, lymphocyte scores were compared when the patients were intubated upon admission. There was a statistically significant difference in the values (p<0.05). Conclusion: Acute phase reactants (AFR) increase in COVID-19 pneumonia. In the follow-up of the disease, it can be used in I-granulocytes with NLR as well as the increase in AFR. In this study, in addition to the increase in acute phase reactants compared to the laboratory data of intubated patients admitted to the intensive care unit, we found higher I-granulocyte and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio ratios.
COVID - 19重症监护患者的插管生物标志物
目的:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行是全球死亡的重要原因,给重症监护病房(ICU)造成了严重负担。许多生物标志物已经在死亡率方面进行了研究,并被常规使用。本研究旨在观察转入重症监护的患者的实验室数据以及插管当天的实验室数据,试图找出哪些生物标志物可以帮助预测插管过程。材料和方法:对新冠肺炎ICU患者的病历进行回顾性分析。该研究包括入院时接受氧疗且在ICU中聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测阳性的患者,以及因呼吸窘迫和/或其他并发症而在24 h后气管插管的患者。病人的信息是从医院的计算机数据库和病人档案中收集的。回顾性分析新冠肺炎ICU住院患者资料。本研究纳入ICU首次入院接受氧疗且PCR检测阳性的患者,以及因呼吸窘迫和/或其他伴随原因在24 h后插管的患者。患者资料来源于医院计算机数据库和患者档案。结果:比较患者入院时插管时乳酸脱氢酶、纤维蛋白原、铁蛋白、d -二聚体、国际标准化比值(INR)、白细胞、中性粒细胞、中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、i -粒细胞、序贯器官衰竭评估评分(p<0.001)及前c、尿素、INR、血红蛋白、淋巴细胞评分。差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:COVID-19肺炎急性期反应物(AFR)升高。在疾病的随访中,可用于有NLR的i -粒细胞以及AFR增高的患者。在这项研究中,除了与重症监护病房插管患者的实验室数据相比,急性期反应物增加外,我们还发现i -粒细胞和中性粒细胞的比例更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信