Taking Comparative Administrative Law (Almost) Seriously? Comparative Administrative Law in French & Belgium Legal Education

R. Bousta, Yseult Marique
{"title":"Taking Comparative Administrative Law (Almost) Seriously? Comparative Administrative Law in French & Belgium Legal Education","authors":"R. Bousta, Yseult Marique","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2711289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a world where states increasingly cooperate on a range of pressing issues (eg immigration, cybercrime, international corruption, etc.) relying heavily on administrative cooperation, comparative administrative law becomes crucial for lawyers to analyse, assess or challenge administrative processes and principles underpinning this international cooperation between states. Equally, lawyers are increasingly mobile, changing jobs and countries over the course of their career. These combined evolutions should encourage to revisit how legal education provide young lawyers with tools to facilitate their critical skills and their mental flexibility, to facilitate their moving around other legal systems or their use of other legal systems in their daily work. Administrative law is a legal field usually famous for its close links with specific historic features of domestic legal systems however. This paper shows that comparative administrative law remains very much an untapped resource to provide these skills. It maps how Belgian and French legal education includes modules entitled “comparative administrative law” in the academic curriculum. Although such formal modules are few, this survey highlights the diversity of ways in which students are encouraged to become more familiar with foreign legal systems and in which legal practice is starting to value the contribution of comparative law.","PeriodicalId":337841,"journal":{"name":"Legal Education eJournal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Education eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2711289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a world where states increasingly cooperate on a range of pressing issues (eg immigration, cybercrime, international corruption, etc.) relying heavily on administrative cooperation, comparative administrative law becomes crucial for lawyers to analyse, assess or challenge administrative processes and principles underpinning this international cooperation between states. Equally, lawyers are increasingly mobile, changing jobs and countries over the course of their career. These combined evolutions should encourage to revisit how legal education provide young lawyers with tools to facilitate their critical skills and their mental flexibility, to facilitate their moving around other legal systems or their use of other legal systems in their daily work. Administrative law is a legal field usually famous for its close links with specific historic features of domestic legal systems however. This paper shows that comparative administrative law remains very much an untapped resource to provide these skills. It maps how Belgian and French legal education includes modules entitled “comparative administrative law” in the academic curriculum. Although such formal modules are few, this survey highlights the diversity of ways in which students are encouraged to become more familiar with foreign legal systems and in which legal practice is starting to value the contribution of comparative law.
(几乎)认真对待比较行政法?法国与比利时法律教育中的比较行政法
在一个国家越来越多地在一系列紧迫问题(如移民,网络犯罪,国际腐败等)上合作的世界,严重依赖于行政合作,比较行政法对于律师分析,评估或挑战支撑国家间国际合作的行政程序和原则至关重要。同样,律师的流动性也越来越强,在职业生涯中会不断变换工作和国家。这些综合的演变应鼓励人们重新审视法律教育如何为年轻律师提供工具,以促进他们的关键技能和心理灵活性,促进他们在其他法律体系中移动或在日常工作中使用其他法律体系。然而,行政法是一个通常以与国内法律制度的特定历史特征密切联系而闻名的法律领域。本文表明,比较行政法在提供这些技能方面仍然是一个尚未开发的资源。它描绘了比利时和法国的法律教育如何在学术课程中包括题为“比较行政法”的模块。虽然这样的正式模块很少,但这项调查强调了鼓励学生更加熟悉外国法律制度的方式的多样性,以及法律实践开始重视比较法的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信