EMG-Based Validation of Musculoskeletal Models Considering Crosstalk

Dominik Jungtäubl, J. Špička, M. Aurbach, F. Süß, M. Melzner, S. Dendorfer
{"title":"EMG-Based Validation of Musculoskeletal Models Considering Crosstalk","authors":"Dominik Jungtäubl, J. Špička, M. Aurbach, F. Süß, M. Melzner, S. Dendorfer","doi":"10.1109/BIOMDLORE.2018.8467211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Validation and verification of multibody musculoskeletal models sEMG is a difficult process because of the reliability of sEMG data and the complex relationship of muscle force and sEMG. OBJECTIVE: This work aims at comparing experimentally recorded and simulated muscle activities considering a numerical model for crosstalk. METHODS: For providing an experimentally derived reference data set, subjects were performing elevations of the arm, where the activities of the contemplated muscle groups were measured by sEMG sensors. Computed muscle activities were further processed and transformed into an artificial electromyographical signal, which includes a numerical crosstalk model. In order to determine whether the crosstalk model provides a better agreement with the measured muscle activities, the Pearson correlation coefficient has been computed as a qualitative way of assessing the curve progression of the data sets. RESULTS: The results show an improvement in the correlation coefficient between the experimental data and the simulated muscle activities when taking crosstalk into account. CONCLUSIONS: Although the correlation coefficient increased when the crosstalk model was utilized, it is questionable if the discretization of both, the crosstalk and the musculoskeletal model, is accurate enough.","PeriodicalId":151729,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference BIOMDLORE","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference BIOMDLORE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOMDLORE.2018.8467211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Validation and verification of multibody musculoskeletal models sEMG is a difficult process because of the reliability of sEMG data and the complex relationship of muscle force and sEMG. OBJECTIVE: This work aims at comparing experimentally recorded and simulated muscle activities considering a numerical model for crosstalk. METHODS: For providing an experimentally derived reference data set, subjects were performing elevations of the arm, where the activities of the contemplated muscle groups were measured by sEMG sensors. Computed muscle activities were further processed and transformed into an artificial electromyographical signal, which includes a numerical crosstalk model. In order to determine whether the crosstalk model provides a better agreement with the measured muscle activities, the Pearson correlation coefficient has been computed as a qualitative way of assessing the curve progression of the data sets. RESULTS: The results show an improvement in the correlation coefficient between the experimental data and the simulated muscle activities when taking crosstalk into account. CONCLUSIONS: Although the correlation coefficient increased when the crosstalk model was utilized, it is questionable if the discretization of both, the crosstalk and the musculoskeletal model, is accurate enough.
基于肌电图的考虑串扰的肌肉骨骼模型验证
背景:由于表面肌电信号数据的可靠性和肌力与表面肌电信号的复杂关系,多体肌肉骨骼模型表面肌电信号的验证和验证是一个困难的过程。目的:在考虑相声数值模型的情况下,比较实验记录和模拟的肌肉活动。方法:为了提供实验导出的参考数据集,受试者将手臂抬高,其中通过肌电传感器测量预期肌肉群的活动。计算得到的肌肉活动进一步处理并转化为人工肌电信号,其中包括一个数值相声模型。为了确定相声模型是否与测量的肌肉活动更好地吻合,计算了Pearson相关系数,作为评估数据集曲线进展的定性方法。结果:考虑相声后,实验数据与模拟肌肉活动的相关系数有所提高。结论:虽然使用串声模型时相关系数增加,但串声和肌肉骨骼模型的离散化是否足够准确值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信