USO DA INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL NO DIREITO BRASILEIRO: REALIDADE POSSÍVEL?

10th International Symposium on Technological Innovation Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.7198/s2318-3403201900010998

R. P. M. C. Celestino, B. A. Pereira, T. I. E. Ucedo

{"title":"USO DA INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL NO DIREITO BRASILEIRO: REALIDADE POSSÍVEL?","authors":"R. P. M. C. Celestino, B. A. Pereira, T. I. E. Ucedo","doi":"10.7198/s2318-3403201900010998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyze and study the use of artificial intelligence tools by law operators, verifying and analyzing their impact on the most diverse segments of law. To obtain the results and answers about the problematization presented in this paper, an exploratory research will be done, based on doctrinal study and also on the technological exploration on patent bases that focus on artificial intelligence directed to the legal scope. Information technology, through artificial intelligence, presents an important transformative path, meanwhile, its application has been resisted by some legal professionals who have a culture of conservatism regarding technology and modernization, and who criticize the replacement of humans. by the machines. With the studies undertaken, it was possible to see that, as advanced as it may be, artificial intelligence is not yet able to perform all the functions of a human brain, since it does not have, for example, a person's creativity, which is why which should not be regarded as a substitute, but only as a complement to human activities.","PeriodicalId":143209,"journal":{"name":"10th International Symposium on Technological Innovation","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th International Symposium on Technological Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7198/s2318-3403201900010998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze and study the use of artificial intelligence tools by law operators, verifying and analyzing their impact on the most diverse segments of law. To obtain the results and answers about the problematization presented in this paper, an exploratory research will be done, based on doctrinal study and also on the technological exploration on patent bases that focus on artificial intelligence directed to the legal scope. Information technology, through artificial intelligence, presents an important transformative path, meanwhile, its application has been resisted by some legal professionals who have a culture of conservatism regarding technology and modernization, and who criticize the replacement of humans. by the machines. With the studies undertaken, it was possible to see that, as advanced as it may be, artificial intelligence is not yet able to perform all the functions of a human brain, since it does not have, for example, a person's creativity, which is why which should not be regarded as a substitute, but only as a complement to human activities.

查看原文本刊更多论文

人工智能在巴西法律中的应用:可能的现实?

本文旨在分析和研究法律从业者对人工智能工具的使用，验证和分析它们对最多样化的法律领域的影响。为了获得本文提出的问题化的结果和答案，我们将在理论研究的基础上，对以人工智能为重点的专利基础进行技术探索，并将其导向法律范围，进行探索性研究。信息技术通过人工智能呈现了一条重要的变革路径，同时，信息技术的应用也受到了一些法律专业人士的抵制，这些人对技术和现代化有着保守主义的文化，批评信息技术取代人类。通过机器。通过这些研究，我们可以看到，尽管人工智能可能很先进，但它还不能完成人脑的所有功能，因为它不具备人类的创造力，这就是为什么它不应该被视为替代，而只能被视为人类活动的补充。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

10th International Symposium on Technological Innovation

自引率

0.00%

发文量