{"title":"A comparison of fractional-pel interpolation filters in HEVC and H.264/AVC","authors":"Hao Lv, Ronggang Wang, Xiaodong Xie, Huizhu Jia, Wen Gao","doi":"10.1109/VCIP.2012.6410767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fractional-pel interpolation filter adopted in H.264/AVC improves motion compensation greatly. Recently, a new DCT-based fractional-pel interpolation filter is adopted in the oncoming standard HEVC. We are interested in the differences between these two types of fractional-pel interpolation filters. In this paper we describe the derivations of fractional-pel interpolation filters in HEVC and H.264/AVC in detail, and compare them on properties of frequency responses. We find that the half-pel interpolation filters in HEVC and H.264/AVC are very similar, but the low-pass properties of quarter-pel interpolation filters in HEVC are much better than those in H.264/AVC. Experimental results validate this phenomenon, the fractional-pel interpolation in H.264/AVC tends to increase BD-rates by more than 10% compared with that in HEVC, and this performance loss mainly comes from quarter-pel interpolation filters. On the other hand, the complexity of fractional-pel interpolation filtering in HEVC is greatly increased than that in H.264/AVC.","PeriodicalId":103073,"journal":{"name":"2012 Visual Communications and Image Processing","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Visual Communications and Image Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VCIP.2012.6410767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36
Abstract
The fractional-pel interpolation filter adopted in H.264/AVC improves motion compensation greatly. Recently, a new DCT-based fractional-pel interpolation filter is adopted in the oncoming standard HEVC. We are interested in the differences between these two types of fractional-pel interpolation filters. In this paper we describe the derivations of fractional-pel interpolation filters in HEVC and H.264/AVC in detail, and compare them on properties of frequency responses. We find that the half-pel interpolation filters in HEVC and H.264/AVC are very similar, but the low-pass properties of quarter-pel interpolation filters in HEVC are much better than those in H.264/AVC. Experimental results validate this phenomenon, the fractional-pel interpolation in H.264/AVC tends to increase BD-rates by more than 10% compared with that in HEVC, and this performance loss mainly comes from quarter-pel interpolation filters. On the other hand, the complexity of fractional-pel interpolation filtering in HEVC is greatly increased than that in H.264/AVC.