Information Elicitation from Rowdy Crowds

G. Schoenebeck, Fang-Yi Yu, Yichi Zhang
{"title":"Information Elicitation from Rowdy Crowds","authors":"G. Schoenebeck, Fang-Yi Yu, Yichi Zhang","doi":"10.1145/3442381.3449840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We initiate the study of information elicitation mechanisms for a crowd containing both self-interested agents, who respond to incentives, and adversarial agents, who may collude to disrupt the system. Our mechanisms work in the peer prediction setting where ground truth need not be accessible to the mechanism or even exist. We provide a meta-mechanism that reduces the design of peer prediction mechanisms to a related robust learning problem. The resulting mechanisms are ϵ-informed truthful, which means truth-telling is the highest paid ϵ-Bayesian Nash equilibrium (up to ϵ-error) and pays strictly more than uninformative equilibria. The value of ϵ depends on the properties of robust learning algorithm, and typically limits to 0 as the number of tasks and agents increase. We show how to use our meta-mechanism to design mechanisms with provable guarantees in two important crowdsourcing settings even when some agents are self-interested and others are adversarial.","PeriodicalId":106672,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3442381.3449840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

We initiate the study of information elicitation mechanisms for a crowd containing both self-interested agents, who respond to incentives, and adversarial agents, who may collude to disrupt the system. Our mechanisms work in the peer prediction setting where ground truth need not be accessible to the mechanism or even exist. We provide a meta-mechanism that reduces the design of peer prediction mechanisms to a related robust learning problem. The resulting mechanisms are ϵ-informed truthful, which means truth-telling is the highest paid ϵ-Bayesian Nash equilibrium (up to ϵ-error) and pays strictly more than uninformative equilibria. The value of ϵ depends on the properties of robust learning algorithm, and typically limits to 0 as the number of tasks and agents increase. We show how to use our meta-mechanism to design mechanisms with provable guarantees in two important crowdsourcing settings even when some agents are self-interested and others are adversarial.
从喧闹人群中获取信息
我们开始研究一个群体的信息激发机制,这个群体既包含对激励做出反应的自利主体,也包含可能串通破坏系统的对抗性主体。我们的机制在同伴预测设置中起作用,在这种设置中,基础真相不需要被机制访问,甚至不需要存在。我们提供了一种元机制,将同伴预测机制的设计简化为相关的鲁棒学习问题。由此产生的机制是ϵ-informed真实的,这意味着说真话是收入最高的ϵ-Bayesian纳什均衡(最高ϵ-error),并且比不提供信息的均衡付出更多。λ的值取决于鲁棒学习算法的特性,通常随着任务和代理数量的增加而限制为0。我们展示了如何在两个重要的众包设置中使用我们的元机制来设计具有可证明保证的机制,即使一些代理是自利的,而另一些代理是敌对的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信