The interplay between maritime security and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: help or hindrance?

Sofia Galani, Malcolm D. Evans
{"title":"The interplay between maritime security and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: help or hindrance?","authors":"Sofia Galani, Malcolm D. Evans","doi":"10.4337/9781788971416.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The seas and oceans cover 70 per cent of the earth’s surface, and 90 per cent of world trade is by sea.1 The oceans have always been a source of power and wealth for states who have been keen to delimit their own maritime limits, but states have also sought to ensure that the high seas remain open to all users. Major maritime nations have enjoyed a military advantage over smaller coastal and landlocked states by using and controlling the maritime domain for the purposes of navigation, commerce and naval warfare. Economic benefits from the development of the blue economy agenda have also become added to the exploitation of fisheries and of marine natural resources, which have traditionally contributed to the economies of states.2 Nevertheless, the continuing economic development of the oceans has been overshadowed by increasing maritime security threats. While traditional forms of inter-state disputes regarding the use and delimitation of their maritime zones remain, new maritime security threats posed by non-state actors have","PeriodicalId":418812,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788971416.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The seas and oceans cover 70 per cent of the earth’s surface, and 90 per cent of world trade is by sea.1 The oceans have always been a source of power and wealth for states who have been keen to delimit their own maritime limits, but states have also sought to ensure that the high seas remain open to all users. Major maritime nations have enjoyed a military advantage over smaller coastal and landlocked states by using and controlling the maritime domain for the purposes of navigation, commerce and naval warfare. Economic benefits from the development of the blue economy agenda have also become added to the exploitation of fisheries and of marine natural resources, which have traditionally contributed to the economies of states.2 Nevertheless, the continuing economic development of the oceans has been overshadowed by increasing maritime security threats. While traditional forms of inter-state disputes regarding the use and delimitation of their maritime zones remain, new maritime security threats posed by non-state actors have
海上安全与1982年《联合国海洋法公约》的相互作用:帮助还是阻碍?
海洋覆盖了地球表面的70%,世界贸易的90%是通过海洋进行的对于那些热衷于划定自己的海洋界限的国家来说,海洋一直是权力和财富的源泉,但各国也寻求确保公海对所有使用者开放。主要海洋国家通过利用和控制海洋领域进行航行、商业和海战,享有比较小的沿海和内陆国家更大的军事优势。从蓝色经济议程的发展中获得的经济利益也被添加到渔业和海洋自然资源的开发中,这些资源传统上对各国的经济做出了贡献然而,不断增加的海上安全威胁给海洋经济的持续发展蒙上了阴影。虽然关于海洋区域使用和划界的传统形式的国家间争端仍然存在,但非国家行为体构成的新的海上安全威胁已经出现
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信