Reliability and validity of light-based screening techniques in detection of oral premalignant lesions

S. Kaleem, S. Asif, M. Z. Kota, A. Kareem, A. Othman, M. Alhusin, Ali Hudian
{"title":"Reliability and validity of light-based screening techniques in detection of oral premalignant lesions","authors":"S. Kaleem, S. Asif, M. Z. Kota, A. Kareem, A. Othman, M. Alhusin, Ali Hudian","doi":"10.4103/1658-743X.291943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess and create awareness towards risk factors like Kath chewing and other tobacco related habits and prevalence of premalignant lesions and early detection through light based Screening tool. Methodology: -First stage comprised of an interview to get demographic and preliminary data for the study. In the second stage, the entire recruited participants underwent an oral examination, and suspected lesions were further seen by specialist dental surgeon. Exclusion is done by a specialist dentist to group them into clinical types based on clinical provisional diagnosis and are referred for histopathologic examination for further management. Third stage all suspected red and white lesions, inconspicuous lesions are screened by Acetic acid and VElscope to identify & confirm visible changes which required histopathological examination for further definitive treatment options. Result: 75% study subjects showed Aceto-whitening, 9.3% subjects showed negative result and 11.4% subjects showed false positive results and 2.8% projected as No Abnormality Detected in acetic acid test. In VElscope examination, 65.6% Showed Positive Dark areas, followed by 34.3 % False Positive results. There were no negative finding. Positive Predictive Value stands more with age old Acetic acid test (75%) when compared with advance methods like VELscope (65.6%). Conclusion: The oral cavity should be carefully examined in tobacco users. Any changes in color or texture of oral mucosa should arouse suspicion of the presence pre malignant lesions and/or oral cancer. Devices like VELscope can be used as a diagnostic aid for identification of these lesions. However, we have to realize that still the histopathological examination is the most accurate method to confirm the diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":344305,"journal":{"name":"King Khalid University Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King Khalid University Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-743X.291943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess and create awareness towards risk factors like Kath chewing and other tobacco related habits and prevalence of premalignant lesions and early detection through light based Screening tool. Methodology: -First stage comprised of an interview to get demographic and preliminary data for the study. In the second stage, the entire recruited participants underwent an oral examination, and suspected lesions were further seen by specialist dental surgeon. Exclusion is done by a specialist dentist to group them into clinical types based on clinical provisional diagnosis and are referred for histopathologic examination for further management. Third stage all suspected red and white lesions, inconspicuous lesions are screened by Acetic acid and VElscope to identify & confirm visible changes which required histopathological examination for further definitive treatment options. Result: 75% study subjects showed Aceto-whitening, 9.3% subjects showed negative result and 11.4% subjects showed false positive results and 2.8% projected as No Abnormality Detected in acetic acid test. In VElscope examination, 65.6% Showed Positive Dark areas, followed by 34.3 % False Positive results. There were no negative finding. Positive Predictive Value stands more with age old Acetic acid test (75%) when compared with advance methods like VELscope (65.6%). Conclusion: The oral cavity should be carefully examined in tobacco users. Any changes in color or texture of oral mucosa should arouse suspicion of the presence pre malignant lesions and/or oral cancer. Devices like VELscope can be used as a diagnostic aid for identification of these lesions. However, we have to realize that still the histopathological examination is the most accurate method to confirm the diagnosis.
光基筛查技术在口腔癌前病变检测中的可靠性和有效性
目的:通过基于光的筛查工具,评估和提高对Kath咀嚼和其他烟草相关习惯等危险因素和癌前病变患病率的认识和早期发现。方法:-第一阶段包括访谈,以获得研究的人口统计和初步数据。在第二阶段,所有被招募的参与者都接受了口腔检查,并由专业牙科医生进一步观察可疑的病变。排除由专科牙医根据临床临时诊断将其分组为临床类型,并转介进行组织病理学检查以作进一步处理。第三阶段,所有可疑的红色和白色病变,不明显的病变,用醋酸和VElscope筛查,以识别和确认可见的变化,需要进行组织病理学检查,以进一步确定治疗方案。结果:75%的研究对象醋酸美白,9.3%的研究对象为阴性,11.4%的研究对象为假阳性,2.8%的研究对象醋酸试验无异常。VElscope检查中,65.6%为暗区阳性,34.3%为假阳性。无阴性结果。与VELscope等先进方法(65.6%)相比,老式醋酸试验(75%)的阳性预测值更高。结论:吸烟人群应仔细检查口腔。口腔黏膜颜色或质地的任何变化都应引起对恶性病变和/或口腔癌的怀疑。像VELscope这样的设备可以作为诊断工具来识别这些病变。然而,我们必须认识到,组织病理学检查仍然是最准确的诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信