Global and Indian Perspectives on Russia-Ukraine War using Sentiment Analysis

Harshrim Pardal, Komal Nagarajan, T. Mahara, Helen Josephine V L
{"title":"Global and Indian Perspectives on Russia-Ukraine War using Sentiment Analysis","authors":"Harshrim Pardal, Komal Nagarajan, T. Mahara, Helen Josephine V L","doi":"10.1145/3590837.3590876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's world, social media has become a platform through which people express their opinions and thoughts regarding various topics. Twitter is one such platform wherein people resort to expressing their opinions or portraying sentiments to the world. Today it has become easier to analyze mass opinion by using sentiment analysis. This paper investigates the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war by analyzing opinionated tweets, and it seeks to understand the sentiments from a global and Indian perspective. Operation Ganga was carried out to evacuate Indian citizens from the war-hit region. Multinomial Naive Bayes classifier classified the tweets into positive, neutral, and negative categories. The paper employed NRCLex for emotion classification and aspect-based sentiment analysis to divide opinions into aspects and determine the sentiment associated with each element. For the study, 4,31,857 tweets were extracted, and the results of sentiment analysis depict that 44.09% users had negative sentiments followed by 33.378% users expressing positive sentiment and remaining 22.53% people were neutral in their tweets. Fear, anger and sadness were amongst the top emotions expressed in the negative tweets whereas the positive tweets expressed trust and anticipation that the war would end soon. Operation Ganga was carried out to evacuate Indian citizens from the war-hit region. An analysis was performed on 1542 tweets that were obtained for Operation Ganga. 74.5% of the users had positive sentiments about Operation Ganga, whereas 16.67% and 8.5% had negative and neutral sentiments respectively. The people trusted this evacuation process resulting in more positive sentiments. Fear of losing near and dear ones and fear of safety was the topmost concern for Indians and leadership was one of the topmost aspects tweeted in the positive sentiments. Thus, the overall results depict that the common man does not prefer war and is fearful of the outcomes. The government should hear the voice of the common man and plan strategies and decisions considering the common man's sentiments.","PeriodicalId":112926,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Management & Machine Intelligence","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Management & Machine Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3590837.3590876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today's world, social media has become a platform through which people express their opinions and thoughts regarding various topics. Twitter is one such platform wherein people resort to expressing their opinions or portraying sentiments to the world. Today it has become easier to analyze mass opinion by using sentiment analysis. This paper investigates the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war by analyzing opinionated tweets, and it seeks to understand the sentiments from a global and Indian perspective. Operation Ganga was carried out to evacuate Indian citizens from the war-hit region. Multinomial Naive Bayes classifier classified the tweets into positive, neutral, and negative categories. The paper employed NRCLex for emotion classification and aspect-based sentiment analysis to divide opinions into aspects and determine the sentiment associated with each element. For the study, 4,31,857 tweets were extracted, and the results of sentiment analysis depict that 44.09% users had negative sentiments followed by 33.378% users expressing positive sentiment and remaining 22.53% people were neutral in their tweets. Fear, anger and sadness were amongst the top emotions expressed in the negative tweets whereas the positive tweets expressed trust and anticipation that the war would end soon. Operation Ganga was carried out to evacuate Indian citizens from the war-hit region. An analysis was performed on 1542 tweets that were obtained for Operation Ganga. 74.5% of the users had positive sentiments about Operation Ganga, whereas 16.67% and 8.5% had negative and neutral sentiments respectively. The people trusted this evacuation process resulting in more positive sentiments. Fear of losing near and dear ones and fear of safety was the topmost concern for Indians and leadership was one of the topmost aspects tweeted in the positive sentiments. Thus, the overall results depict that the common man does not prefer war and is fearful of the outcomes. The government should hear the voice of the common man and plan strategies and decisions considering the common man's sentiments.
全球和印度视角下的俄乌战争情绪分析
在当今世界,社交媒体已经成为人们就各种话题表达意见和想法的平台。推特就是这样一个平台,人们在这里向世界表达自己的观点或描绘自己的情绪。如今,通过情感分析来分析大众意见变得更加容易。本文通过分析固执己见的推文来调查正在进行的俄乌战争,并试图从全球和印度的角度来理解这种情绪。“恒河行动”是为了从受战争影响的地区撤离印度公民。多项朴素贝叶斯分类器将推文分为积极、中性和消极三类。本文采用NRCLex进行情绪分类和基于方面的情绪分析,将观点划分为方面,并确定与每个元素相关的情绪。本研究提取了431857条推文,情绪分析结果显示,44.09%的用户持负面情绪,其次是33.378%的用户持积极情绪,其余22.53%的用户持中立态度。恐惧、愤怒和悲伤是负面推文中表达的最主要情绪,而积极推文则表达了信任和对战争即将结束的期待。“恒河行动”是为了从受战争影响的地区撤离印度公民。对1542条为恒河行动获得的推文进行了分析,74.5%的用户对恒河行动持积极态度,而16.67%和8.5%的用户分别持消极和中立态度。人们相信这个撤离过程会产生更积极的情绪。对失去亲人的恐惧和对安全的恐惧是印度人最关心的问题,而领导力是推特上最积极的方面之一。因此,总体结果表明,普通人不喜欢战争,害怕战争的结果。政府应该倾听老百姓的声音,考虑到老百姓的情绪,制定战略和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信