New Methods Used for the Smoothing of the Three-Dimensional Flow Behind the Turbine Nozzle Cascade

Subotovich Subotovich, A. Lapuzin, Y. Yudin
{"title":"New Methods Used for the Smoothing of the Three-Dimensional Flow Behind the Turbine Nozzle Cascade","authors":"Subotovich Subotovich, A. Lapuzin, Y. Yudin","doi":"10.20998/2078-774x.2021.01.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To smooth the parameters of the three-dimensional flow behind the nozzle cascade new methods were suggested that allow us to sustain the flow rate, stagnation enthalpy and the axial projection of the moment of momentum for initial-, nonuniform and averaged flows. It was shown that the choice of the fourth integral characteristic (the kinetic energy, the entropy and the quantity of motion) has no particular significance because it has no effect on the complex criterion of the cascade quality, i.e. the velocity coefficient-angle cosine product that characterizes the level of the radial component of velocity. The minimum values of the velocity coefficient and the cosine angle satisfy the method that allows us to sustain the quantity of motion during the smoothing and the maximum values of the specified nozzle characteristics satisfy method 2 that enables the entropy maintenance. To evaluate the aerodynamic efficiency of the nozzle cascade the preference should be given to method 1 that enables the kinetic energy conservation and the velocity coefficient allows for the precise determination of the degree of loss of the kinetic energy that is equal to 3.6 % as for the example given in the scientific paper. As for method 1, the kinematic losses in the cascade are defined by the angle cosine that characterizes the level of the radial component of the velocity behind the cascade. For the example in question, kinematic losses are equal to 1.9 % and the complex criterion of quality equal to 0.972 corresponds to the overall losses of 5.5 %. It was suggested to use the velocity coefficient and the two angles of flow as integral cascade characteristics. The use of these characteristics enables the correct computations of the efficiency factor for the stage within the one-dimensional computation. The incisive analysis was performed for different methods used for the averaging of the parameters of the axially asymmetric flow behind the nozzle cascade. It was suggested to neglect the flow rate factor in the case of thermal computations done for the turbine stage.","PeriodicalId":416126,"journal":{"name":"NTU \"KhPI\" Bulletin: Power and heat engineering processes and equipment","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NTU \"KhPI\" Bulletin: Power and heat engineering processes and equipment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-774x.2021.01.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To smooth the parameters of the three-dimensional flow behind the nozzle cascade new methods were suggested that allow us to sustain the flow rate, stagnation enthalpy and the axial projection of the moment of momentum for initial-, nonuniform and averaged flows. It was shown that the choice of the fourth integral characteristic (the kinetic energy, the entropy and the quantity of motion) has no particular significance because it has no effect on the complex criterion of the cascade quality, i.e. the velocity coefficient-angle cosine product that characterizes the level of the radial component of velocity. The minimum values of the velocity coefficient and the cosine angle satisfy the method that allows us to sustain the quantity of motion during the smoothing and the maximum values of the specified nozzle characteristics satisfy method 2 that enables the entropy maintenance. To evaluate the aerodynamic efficiency of the nozzle cascade the preference should be given to method 1 that enables the kinetic energy conservation and the velocity coefficient allows for the precise determination of the degree of loss of the kinetic energy that is equal to 3.6 % as for the example given in the scientific paper. As for method 1, the kinematic losses in the cascade are defined by the angle cosine that characterizes the level of the radial component of the velocity behind the cascade. For the example in question, kinematic losses are equal to 1.9 % and the complex criterion of quality equal to 0.972 corresponds to the overall losses of 5.5 %. It was suggested to use the velocity coefficient and the two angles of flow as integral cascade characteristics. The use of these characteristics enables the correct computations of the efficiency factor for the stage within the one-dimensional computation. The incisive analysis was performed for different methods used for the averaging of the parameters of the axially asymmetric flow behind the nozzle cascade. It was suggested to neglect the flow rate factor in the case of thermal computations done for the turbine stage.
涡轮喷管叶栅后三维流动平滑的新方法
为了平滑喷管叶栅后三维流动的参数,提出了新的方法,使我们能够维持初始、非均匀和平均流动的流速、停滞焓和动量矩的轴向投影。结果表明,第四个积分特征(动能、熵和运动量)的选择没有特别重要的意义,因为它对叶栅质量的复杂判据,即表征速度径向分量水平的速度系数-角余弦积没有影响。速度系数和余弦角的最小值满足使我们能够在平滑期间维持运动量的方法,指定喷嘴特性的最大值满足使熵保持的方法2。为了评估喷嘴叶栅的气动效率,应该优先考虑方法1,它使动能守恒,速度系数允许精确确定动能损失的程度,如科学论文中给出的例子等于3.6%。对于方法1,叶栅中的运动损失由角余弦定义,余弦表征了叶栅后速度的径向分量的水平。对于问题中的例子,运动学损失等于1.9%,质量的复杂标准等于0.972对应于5.5%的总损失。建议采用速度系数和两个气流角作为叶栅的整体特性。利用这些特性,可以在一维计算中正确计算出该阶段的效率系数。对喷嘴叶栅后轴不对称流参数的不同平均方法进行了深入分析。建议在对涡轮级进行热计算时忽略流量因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信