Serratus anterior plane block versus intravenous opioid use for acute post-thoracotomy pain

F. Badawy, Abd El-Rahman Hassan El-Rahman, K. Hassan, Asmaa Farghaly Gad-Allah, K. Abdelfattah
{"title":"Serratus anterior plane block versus intravenous opioid use for acute post-thoracotomy pain","authors":"F. Badawy, Abd El-Rahman Hassan El-Rahman, K. Hassan, Asmaa Farghaly Gad-Allah, K. Abdelfattah","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_63_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Inadequate treatment of post-thoracotomy pain can lead to both acute impact on patient comfort and pulmonary function, and long-term pain interfering with patients’ regular activities for a long time. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) as a regional analgesic procedure in post-thoracotomy pain. Patients and methods In this randomized, prospective, interventional, single-center, and double-blind study, patients were randomly assigned into two groups of 30 patients each. Group A: patients were subjected to standard anesthesia and ultrasound-guided SAPB using 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine after induction of anesthesia. In addition, rescue postoperative intravenous opioid analgesia was used when needed to maintain the visual analog scale (VAS) at less than or equal to 3.Group B: standard anesthesia was done, and titrated postoperative intravenous opioid analgesia was used for post-thoracotomy pain relief to maintain the VAS at less than or equal to 3. Our primary outcome was to measure postoperative VAS at rest and on coughing up to 24 h postoperatively. Our secondary outcomes were to measure total intraoperative and postoperative opioid used, to record opioid use over time intervals, time to first postoperative opioid administration, and to assess opioid-related complications, all up to 24 h postoperatively. Results VAS at rest and on coughing up to 6 h postoperatively was significantly less in the SAPB group, and there was no significant difference between both groups from 6 h up to 24 h postoperatively. Total intravenous opioids used, total intraoperative fentanyl, total postoperative morphine, and time-related postoperative morphine up to 6 h postoperatively were significantly less in the SAPB group, and there was no significant difference between both groups from 6 up to 24 h postoperatively. The time to first postoperative opioid use was also significantly longer in the SAPB group. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided SAPB can be an effective technique for post-thoracotomy analgesia with probably better pain control compared with intravenous opioid analgesia alone, with less total opioid use.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_63_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Inadequate treatment of post-thoracotomy pain can lead to both acute impact on patient comfort and pulmonary function, and long-term pain interfering with patients’ regular activities for a long time. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) as a regional analgesic procedure in post-thoracotomy pain. Patients and methods In this randomized, prospective, interventional, single-center, and double-blind study, patients were randomly assigned into two groups of 30 patients each. Group A: patients were subjected to standard anesthesia and ultrasound-guided SAPB using 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine after induction of anesthesia. In addition, rescue postoperative intravenous opioid analgesia was used when needed to maintain the visual analog scale (VAS) at less than or equal to 3.Group B: standard anesthesia was done, and titrated postoperative intravenous opioid analgesia was used for post-thoracotomy pain relief to maintain the VAS at less than or equal to 3. Our primary outcome was to measure postoperative VAS at rest and on coughing up to 24 h postoperatively. Our secondary outcomes were to measure total intraoperative and postoperative opioid used, to record opioid use over time intervals, time to first postoperative opioid administration, and to assess opioid-related complications, all up to 24 h postoperatively. Results VAS at rest and on coughing up to 6 h postoperatively was significantly less in the SAPB group, and there was no significant difference between both groups from 6 h up to 24 h postoperatively. Total intravenous opioids used, total intraoperative fentanyl, total postoperative morphine, and time-related postoperative morphine up to 6 h postoperatively were significantly less in the SAPB group, and there was no significant difference between both groups from 6 up to 24 h postoperatively. The time to first postoperative opioid use was also significantly longer in the SAPB group. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided SAPB can be an effective technique for post-thoracotomy analgesia with probably better pain control compared with intravenous opioid analgesia alone, with less total opioid use.
锯肌前平面阻滞与静脉使用阿片类药物治疗急性开胸术后疼痛
背景对开胸术后疼痛治疗不当,既会急性影响患者的舒适度和肺功能,也会长期影响患者的正常活动。本研究旨在评估锯肌前平面阻滞(SAPB)作为一种局部镇痛方法对开胸术后疼痛的镇痛效果。在这项随机、前瞻性、介入性、单中心、双盲研究中,患者被随机分为两组,每组30例患者。A组:诱导麻醉后采用标准麻醉,超声引导下使用0.25%布比卡因30 ml进行SAPB。此外,当需要维持视觉模拟评分(VAS)小于或等于3分时,术后给予紧急静脉阿片类镇痛。B组:标准麻醉,术后静脉滴注阿片类镇痛用于开胸后镇痛,维持VAS≤3。我们的主要结果是测量术后休息时和术后24小时咳嗽时的VAS。我们的次要结果是测量术中和术后阿片类药物的总使用量,记录阿片类药物的使用时间间隔,术后第一次阿片类药物使用时间,并评估阿片类药物相关并发症,所有这些都持续到术后24小时。结果SAPB组术后6 h及休息时VAS评分明显低于对照组,术后6 h至24 h评分差异无统计学意义。SAPB组术后6 h静脉总阿片类药物用量、术中总芬太尼用量、术后总吗啡用量、术后时间相关吗啡用量均显著低于SAPB组,两组术后6 ~ 24 h无显著差异。SAPB组术后首次使用阿片类药物的时间也明显更长。结论超声引导下SAPB是一种有效的开胸后镇痛技术,与单纯静脉阿片类药物镇痛相比,其镇痛效果可能更好,且阿片类药物的总用量较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信