The prametric-based GDM selection procedure under linguistic assessments

Fujun Hou
{"title":"The prametric-based GDM selection procedure under linguistic assessments","authors":"Fujun Hou","doi":"10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2015.7337821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prametric-based procedure is a group decision making (GDM) selection process minimizing a consensus gap indicator, which is not a metric but a prametric. The prametric is an `almost metric' which does not necessarily satisfy the triangle inequality but able to describe the consensus intransitivity in GDM. This paper considers the procedure under a linguistic situation, where the individuals preferences are provided as linguistic preference relations. The procedure contains two main stages. The first stage looks for the individual's ties-permitted ordinal rankings from the individual's opinions. In order to do this, we introduce an acceptable consistency criterion for linguistic preference relations and show some related properties. If the linguistic preference relation is acceptable, we then obtain the ties-permitted ordinal ranking directly. Otherwise, the ties-permitted ordinal ranking will be deduced by minimizing a consensus gap. The second stage looks for the final solution sets of alternatives by minimizing the gap between a potential solution and the rankings obtained in the first stage. Some illustrative examples are included.","PeriodicalId":185191,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2015.7337821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The prametric-based procedure is a group decision making (GDM) selection process minimizing a consensus gap indicator, which is not a metric but a prametric. The prametric is an `almost metric' which does not necessarily satisfy the triangle inequality but able to describe the consensus intransitivity in GDM. This paper considers the procedure under a linguistic situation, where the individuals preferences are provided as linguistic preference relations. The procedure contains two main stages. The first stage looks for the individual's ties-permitted ordinal rankings from the individual's opinions. In order to do this, we introduce an acceptable consistency criterion for linguistic preference relations and show some related properties. If the linguistic preference relation is acceptable, we then obtain the ties-permitted ordinal ranking directly. Otherwise, the ties-permitted ordinal ranking will be deduced by minimizing a consensus gap. The second stage looks for the final solution sets of alternatives by minimizing the gap between a potential solution and the rankings obtained in the first stage. Some illustrative examples are included.
语言评估下基于参数的GDM选择程序
基于参数的程序是最小化共识差距指标的群体决策(GDM)选择过程,该指标不是度量,而是参数。该参数是一个“几乎度量”,它不一定满足三角不等式,但能够描述GDM中的一致不可及性。本文考虑在语言情境下的过程,其中个体的偏好被提供为语言偏好关系。这个过程包括两个主要阶段。第一阶段从个人的意见中寻找个人的关系——允许的顺序排名。为了做到这一点,我们为语言偏好关系引入了一个可接受的一致性标准,并展示了一些相关的性质。如果语言偏好关系是可接受的,我们就直接得到关系允许的序数排序。否则,将通过最小化共识差距来推导出允许的顺序排序。第二阶段通过最小化潜在解决方案与第一阶段获得的排名之间的差距来寻找备选方案的最终解决方案集。包括一些说明性的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信