How Do People Decide on Life Insurance and Long-Term Disability Insurance Coverage?

Norma B. Coe, Anek Belbase
{"title":"How Do People Decide on Life Insurance and Long-Term Disability Insurance Coverage?","authors":"Norma B. Coe, Anek Belbase","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2613065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The group benefits landscape is changing dramatically. The menu of available options has grown; employers are paying for fewer benefits; and the responsibility for selecting the benefit package has been increasingly left to the employee. However, unlike in the pension world, very little is known about how individuals select their benefits packages, if their selections are optimal for their situations, or what employers can do to encourage the optimal benefit package selection. In this changing benefit landscape, it is important to determine three things: (1) What are current employer practices and their resulting take-up and coverage patterns?; (2) Which practices influence employees’ selections?; and (3) What can employers do to make the employees’ selections closer to the employees’ optimal choices? This first analysis allows us to peer into the black box of employee decision-making and identify what behavioral finance concepts are at play in the group benefits arena. Using information from 24 in-depth telephone interviews, we gain important insight into how employees determine whether to buy supplemental life and supplemental long-term disability insurance, how they decide how much to buy, what they liked and understood from their employer’s presentation, and what features might make these insurance benefits more appealing to the individual.","PeriodicalId":423793,"journal":{"name":"SIRN: Health Insurance (Topic)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIRN: Health Insurance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2613065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The group benefits landscape is changing dramatically. The menu of available options has grown; employers are paying for fewer benefits; and the responsibility for selecting the benefit package has been increasingly left to the employee. However, unlike in the pension world, very little is known about how individuals select their benefits packages, if their selections are optimal for their situations, or what employers can do to encourage the optimal benefit package selection. In this changing benefit landscape, it is important to determine three things: (1) What are current employer practices and their resulting take-up and coverage patterns?; (2) Which practices influence employees’ selections?; and (3) What can employers do to make the employees’ selections closer to the employees’ optimal choices? This first analysis allows us to peer into the black box of employee decision-making and identify what behavioral finance concepts are at play in the group benefits arena. Using information from 24 in-depth telephone interviews, we gain important insight into how employees determine whether to buy supplemental life and supplemental long-term disability insurance, how they decide how much to buy, what they liked and understood from their employer’s presentation, and what features might make these insurance benefits more appealing to the individual.
人们如何决定人寿保险和长期伤残保险的范围?
集团利益格局正在发生巨大变化。可用选项的菜单已经增加;雇主支付的福利减少了;选择福利待遇的责任越来越多地交给了员工。然而,与养老金世界不同的是,对于个人如何选择他们的福利方案,他们的选择是否最适合他们的情况,或者雇主可以做些什么来鼓励最优的福利方案选择,人们知之甚少。在这种不断变化的福利格局中,确定三件事很重要:(1)当前雇主的做法及其产生的吸收和覆盖模式是什么?(2)哪些做法影响了员工的选择?(3)雇主如何使员工的选择更接近员工的最优选择?这第一个分析让我们得以窥探员工决策的黑箱,并确定行为金融概念在群体利益领域发挥了什么作用。利用24个深度电话访谈的信息,我们获得了员工如何决定是否购买补充人寿保险和补充长期残疾保险的重要见解,他们如何决定购买多少,他们喜欢和理解雇主的介绍,以及哪些特征可能使这些保险福利对个人更有吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信