“A lie that pandered to racism and xenophobia”

Orlaith Darling
{"title":"“A lie that pandered to racism and xenophobia”","authors":"Orlaith Darling","doi":"10.2218/FORUM.28.3049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perhaps one of the most significant votes in British history occurred in June 2016. Primarily dominated by buzzwords such as ‘control’, ‘borders’ and ‘immigration’, Brexit has been a hugely divisive process for the UK. This division and internal wall-building is nowhere more evident than in domestic British race relations; indeed, in the week following the referendum, the number of racial hate crimes committed rose by 500%. This article examines the idea of borders in a contemporary British context, drawing on historic and recurrent iterations of empire (historical colonialism and the Windrush Scandal) and the Second World War as a founding national mythologies. It argues that Brexit represents post-war paranoia regarding European invasion, nostalgia for the glory days of Empire, and a fear of the post-colonial ‘other’ as a threat to monolithic tenets of British identity. Zadie Smith’s novel, White Teeth, is harnessed throughout as a means of giving literary scope to these arguments, and as a means of highlighting how this manic obsession with borders is a long-standing aspect of British life (the novel was published in 2000 and therefore preceded the Brexit conversation). Moreover, discussion of the themes of non-white British identities, inter-racial breeding and genetics in Smith’s novel will be placed alongside a contemplation of ‘maternity tourism’ which has recently abounded in the British press. ‘Maternity tourism’ comprises, I argue, a fear of the post-colonial female body and a distrust of the maternal body as a weak border which threatens the cohesive, white homogeneity of British society.","PeriodicalId":439591,"journal":{"name":"FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture & the Arts","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture & the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/FORUM.28.3049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perhaps one of the most significant votes in British history occurred in June 2016. Primarily dominated by buzzwords such as ‘control’, ‘borders’ and ‘immigration’, Brexit has been a hugely divisive process for the UK. This division and internal wall-building is nowhere more evident than in domestic British race relations; indeed, in the week following the referendum, the number of racial hate crimes committed rose by 500%. This article examines the idea of borders in a contemporary British context, drawing on historic and recurrent iterations of empire (historical colonialism and the Windrush Scandal) and the Second World War as a founding national mythologies. It argues that Brexit represents post-war paranoia regarding European invasion, nostalgia for the glory days of Empire, and a fear of the post-colonial ‘other’ as a threat to monolithic tenets of British identity. Zadie Smith’s novel, White Teeth, is harnessed throughout as a means of giving literary scope to these arguments, and as a means of highlighting how this manic obsession with borders is a long-standing aspect of British life (the novel was published in 2000 and therefore preceded the Brexit conversation). Moreover, discussion of the themes of non-white British identities, inter-racial breeding and genetics in Smith’s novel will be placed alongside a contemplation of ‘maternity tourism’ which has recently abounded in the British press. ‘Maternity tourism’ comprises, I argue, a fear of the post-colonial female body and a distrust of the maternal body as a weak border which threatens the cohesive, white homogeneity of British society.
“迎合种族主义和仇外心理的谎言”
或许英国历史上最重要的一次投票发生在2016年6月。“脱欧”主要是由“控制”、“边界”和“移民”等流行语主导的,对英国来说,这是一个巨大的分裂过程。这种分裂和内部隔离在英国国内的种族关系中表现得最为明显;事实上,在公投后的一周内,种族仇恨犯罪的数量上升了500%。本文考察了当代英国背景下的边界概念,借鉴了历史上和反复出现的帝国(历史殖民主义和风刮丑闻)和作为建国神话的第二次世界大战。它认为,英国脱欧代表了战后对欧洲入侵的偏执,对帝国辉煌岁月的怀念,以及对后殖民时期“他者”对英国身份统一原则的威胁的恐惧。扎迪·史密斯(Zadie Smith)的小说《白牙》(White Teeth)贯穿始终,为这些争论提供了文学视角,并强调了这种对边界的狂热痴迷是英国人生活中长期存在的一个方面(小说出版于2000年,因此早于脱欧对话)。此外,在史密斯的小说中,关于非白人英国人身份、跨种族繁殖和遗传学等主题的讨论将与最近在英国媒体上大量出现的“生育旅游”的思考放在一起。我认为,“产妇旅游”包含了对后殖民女性身体的恐惧,以及对母性身体的不信任,因为母性身体是一个脆弱的边界,威胁着英国社会的凝聚力和白人同质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信