Can vitamin D status influence the effect of stress on planning and problem-solving? A randomized control trial

A. Hansen, G. Ambroziak, D. Thornton, J. Mundt, Rachel E. Kahn, L. Dahl, Leif Waage, Daniel Kattenbraker, B. Grung
{"title":"Can vitamin D status influence the effect of stress on planning and problem-solving? A randomized control trial","authors":"A. Hansen, G. Ambroziak, D. Thornton, J. Mundt, Rachel E. Kahn, L. Dahl, Leif Waage, Daniel Kattenbraker, B. Grung","doi":"10.29219/fnr.v67.8970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nutritional interventions may serve as a stress resilience strategy with important implications for human health. \nObjective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation throughout wintertime on problem-solving and planning abilities during stressful circumstances. \nDesign: A total of 77 male inpatients with a mean age of 48 years (range 31–81) and stress-related mental health disorders were randomly assigned into a Vitamin D supplement group (daily intake of 40 μg) or a placebo supplement group (Control) (daily intake of 120 mg olive oil). The intervention period was from January 2018 to May 2018. The means and standard deviations for vitamin D status (25-hydroxyvitamin D3, nmol/L), pre- and post-test, respectively, were 58(21) and 46(15) for the Control group, and 63(18) and 76(21) for the Vitamin D group. Problem-solving and planning abilities were measured by the Tower of London (ToL) task pre- (midwinter) and post- (spring) supplement intervention. The ToL task was performed during exposure to distracting noise. \nResults: The results revealed that vitamin D supplementation throughout the winter had a significant effect on number of correct responses on easier (1 and 2 move) ToL problems during stress; the Vitamin D group improved significantly from pre- to post-test, whereas the Control group did not. In addition, the Vitamin D group had significantly more correct responses than the Control group on post-test. The improved performance was not related to a speed-accuracy trade off effect; both groups showed significantly decreased planning times from pre- to post-test. The intervention did not differentially affect task performance on the more difficult (3 to 5 move) ToL problems. For the more demanding problems, IQ seemed to explain most of the variance regarding accuracy. Age explained most of the variance associated with task planning time. \nConclusion: Vitamin D supplementation seemed to improve resilience to stress, but it was limited to performance of easier tasks \n ","PeriodicalId":149344,"journal":{"name":"Food & Nutrition Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food & Nutrition Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v67.8970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nutritional interventions may serve as a stress resilience strategy with important implications for human health. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation throughout wintertime on problem-solving and planning abilities during stressful circumstances. Design: A total of 77 male inpatients with a mean age of 48 years (range 31–81) and stress-related mental health disorders were randomly assigned into a Vitamin D supplement group (daily intake of 40 μg) or a placebo supplement group (Control) (daily intake of 120 mg olive oil). The intervention period was from January 2018 to May 2018. The means and standard deviations for vitamin D status (25-hydroxyvitamin D3, nmol/L), pre- and post-test, respectively, were 58(21) and 46(15) for the Control group, and 63(18) and 76(21) for the Vitamin D group. Problem-solving and planning abilities were measured by the Tower of London (ToL) task pre- (midwinter) and post- (spring) supplement intervention. The ToL task was performed during exposure to distracting noise. Results: The results revealed that vitamin D supplementation throughout the winter had a significant effect on number of correct responses on easier (1 and 2 move) ToL problems during stress; the Vitamin D group improved significantly from pre- to post-test, whereas the Control group did not. In addition, the Vitamin D group had significantly more correct responses than the Control group on post-test. The improved performance was not related to a speed-accuracy trade off effect; both groups showed significantly decreased planning times from pre- to post-test. The intervention did not differentially affect task performance on the more difficult (3 to 5 move) ToL problems. For the more demanding problems, IQ seemed to explain most of the variance regarding accuracy. Age explained most of the variance associated with task planning time. Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation seemed to improve resilience to stress, but it was limited to performance of easier tasks  
维生素D水平会影响压力对计划和解决问题的影响吗?随机对照试验
背景:营养干预可以作为一种应激恢复策略,对人类健康具有重要意义。目的:本研究的目的是研究在冬季补充维生素D对压力环境下解决问题和计划能力的影响。设计:77例平均年龄为48岁(31-81岁)、有压力相关精神健康障碍的男性住院患者随机分为维生素D补充组(每日摄入40 μg)和安慰剂补充组(对照组)(每日摄入120 mg橄榄油)。干预期为2018年1月至2018年5月。维生素D状态(25-羟基维生素D3, nmol/L),测试前后,对照组的平均值和标准差分别为58(21)和46(15),维生素D组的平均值和标准差分别为63(18)和76(21)。解决问题和计划能力通过伦敦塔(ToL)任务前(冬至)和后(春季)补充干预来测量。ToL任务是在噪声干扰下进行的。结果:整个冬季补充维生素D对压力下较容易(1步和2步)的ToL问题的正确反应次数有显著影响;维生素D组从测试前到测试后显著改善,而对照组则没有。此外,维生素D组在测试后的正确反应明显高于对照组。改进的性能与速度-精度权衡效应无关;两组测试前后的计划时间均显著缩短。在难度较大(3到5步)的ToL问题上,干预对任务表现没有显著影响。对于要求更高的问题,智商似乎可以解释准确度方面的大部分差异。年龄解释了与任务计划时间相关的大部分差异。结论:补充维生素D似乎可以提高抗压力能力,但仅限于完成更容易的任务
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信