Cognitive Load Measurement in the Impact of VR Intervention in Learning

Chunping Li, Soonja Yeom, Julian R. Dermoudy, K. Salas
{"title":"Cognitive Load Measurement in the Impact of VR Intervention in Learning","authors":"Chunping Li, Soonja Yeom, Julian R. Dermoudy, K. Salas","doi":"10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid development of VR technology in training and learning is based on the assumption that it is beneficial for skill training within an immersive environment. However, extra cognitive load may be induced due to the additional sensory information and hence learning ability might be affected. In this study, we examined and compared the impact of cognitive load and task performance in real-world and VR environments through an empirical quadrant model. Forty-six participants completed the tasks with and without the secondary task in realworld and VR environments. The detection response task (DRT), as the secondary task, was adopted to estimate cognitive load based on response time and omission rate. No statistically significant differences were found in cognitive load and task performance in the comparison of VR and non-VR environment settings. There was an encouraging trend observed that VR environments have some advantages over the real-world, such as a higher level of immersion, which suggests that VR can benefit trainees with improved concentration levels and task performance. As evidenced by the variation in performance between females and males in our study, it appears that females tend to perform less well in VR environments, with a slightly higher cognitive load.","PeriodicalId":221464,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid development of VR technology in training and learning is based on the assumption that it is beneficial for skill training within an immersive environment. However, extra cognitive load may be induced due to the additional sensory information and hence learning ability might be affected. In this study, we examined and compared the impact of cognitive load and task performance in real-world and VR environments through an empirical quadrant model. Forty-six participants completed the tasks with and without the secondary task in realworld and VR environments. The detection response task (DRT), as the secondary task, was adopted to estimate cognitive load based on response time and omission rate. No statistically significant differences were found in cognitive load and task performance in the comparison of VR and non-VR environment settings. There was an encouraging trend observed that VR environments have some advantages over the real-world, such as a higher level of immersion, which suggests that VR can benefit trainees with improved concentration levels and task performance. As evidenced by the variation in performance between females and males in our study, it appears that females tend to perform less well in VR environments, with a slightly higher cognitive load.
认知负荷测量在虚拟现实干预学习中的影响
VR技术在培训和学习中的快速发展是基于它有利于在沉浸式环境中进行技能培训的假设。然而,由于额外的感官信息,可能会引起额外的认知负荷,从而影响学习能力。在本研究中,我们通过经验象限模型检验并比较了现实世界和虚拟现实环境中认知负荷和任务绩效的影响。46名参与者分别在现实世界和虚拟现实环境中完成了有和没有辅助任务的任务。检测反应任务(DRT)作为次要任务,根据反应时间和遗漏率估计认知负荷。虚拟现实和非虚拟现实环境设置在认知负荷和任务表现方面无统计学差异。有一个令人鼓舞的趋势是,虚拟现实环境比现实世界有一些优势,比如更高程度的沉浸感,这表明虚拟现实可以提高学员的注意力水平和任务表现。正如我们研究中男女表现差异所证明的那样,女性在虚拟现实环境中表现不佳,认知负荷略高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信