Adaptive randomized mutual exclusion in sub-logarithmic expected time

Danny Hendler, Philipp Woelfel
{"title":"Adaptive randomized mutual exclusion in sub-logarithmic expected time","authors":"Danny Hendler, Philipp Woelfel","doi":"10.1145/1835698.1835737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mutual exclusion is a fundamental distributed coordination problem. Shared-memory mutual exclusion research focuses on local-spin algorithms and uses the remote memory references (RMRs) metric. A mutual exclusion algorithm is adaptive to point contention, if its RMR complexity is a function of the maximum number of processes concurrently executing their entry, critical, or exit section. In the best prior art deterministic adaptive mutual exclusion algorithm, presented by Kim and Anderson [22], a process performs O(min(k,log N)) RMRs as it enters and exits its critical section, where k is point contention and N is the number of processes in the system. Kim and Anderson also proved that a deterministic algorithm with o(k) RMR complexity does not exist [21]. However, they describe a randomized mutual exclusion algorithm that has O(log k) expected RMR complexity against an oblivious adversary. All these results apply for algorithms that use only atomic read and write operations. We present a randomized adaptive mutual exclusion algorithms with O(log k/loglog k) expected amortized RMR complexity, even against a strong adversary, for the cache-coherent shared memory read/write model. Using techniques similar to those used in [17], our algorithm can be adapted for the distributed shared memory read/write model. This establishes that sub-logarithmic adaptive mutual exclusion, using reads and writes only, is possible.","PeriodicalId":447863,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing","volume":"245 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1835698.1835737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Mutual exclusion is a fundamental distributed coordination problem. Shared-memory mutual exclusion research focuses on local-spin algorithms and uses the remote memory references (RMRs) metric. A mutual exclusion algorithm is adaptive to point contention, if its RMR complexity is a function of the maximum number of processes concurrently executing their entry, critical, or exit section. In the best prior art deterministic adaptive mutual exclusion algorithm, presented by Kim and Anderson [22], a process performs O(min(k,log N)) RMRs as it enters and exits its critical section, where k is point contention and N is the number of processes in the system. Kim and Anderson also proved that a deterministic algorithm with o(k) RMR complexity does not exist [21]. However, they describe a randomized mutual exclusion algorithm that has O(log k) expected RMR complexity against an oblivious adversary. All these results apply for algorithms that use only atomic read and write operations. We present a randomized adaptive mutual exclusion algorithms with O(log k/loglog k) expected amortized RMR complexity, even against a strong adversary, for the cache-coherent shared memory read/write model. Using techniques similar to those used in [17], our algorithm can be adapted for the distributed shared memory read/write model. This establishes that sub-logarithmic adaptive mutual exclusion, using reads and writes only, is possible.
次对数期望时间下的自适应随机互斥
互斥是一个基本的分布式协调问题。共享内存互斥研究侧重于局部自旋算法,并使用远程内存引用(RMRs)度量。如果互斥算法的RMR复杂度是并发执行其入口段、临界段或退出段的最大进程数的函数,则互斥算法自适应于点争用。在Kim和Anderson[22]提出的最佳现有技术确定性自适应互排算法中,进程在进入和退出其临界区域时执行O(min(k,log N)) rmr,其中k为点争用,N为系统中的进程数。Kim和Anderson也证明了不存在复杂度为0 (k) RMR的确定性算法[21]。然而,他们描述了一种随机互斥算法,该算法具有O(log k)的预期RMR复杂度,以对抗无意识对手。所有这些结果都适用于只使用原子读写操作的算法。我们提出了一种随机自适应互斥算法,其期望平摊RMR复杂度为O(log k/loglog k),即使面对强大的对手,也可以用于缓存一致共享内存读/写模型。使用类似于[17]中使用的技术,我们的算法可以适用于分布式共享内存读/写模型。这表明,只使用读和写的次对数自适应互斥是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信