Prosodic and lexical entrainment in adults with and without schizophrenia

J. Kruyt, S. Benus, C. Faget, C. Lançon, M. Champagne-Lavau
{"title":"Prosodic and lexical entrainment in adults with and without schizophrenia","authors":"J. Kruyt, S. Benus, C. Faget, C. Lançon, M. Champagne-Lavau","doi":"10.21437/speechprosody.2022-26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entrainment refers to the tendency people have to speak more similarly during a conversation. Although entrainment has been observed frequently, the underlying mechanisms of the phe-nomenon are debated. A specific point of disagreement is the role of social or higher-order cognitive factors in entrainment. The present study aimed to explore prosodic and lexical entrainment in small groups of individuals with schizophrenia, a dis-order that has been associated with theory of mind impairments and social difficulties, and a control group without schizophrenia. All participants completed a referential communication task with an experimenter. To determine prosodic entrainment, the measures proposed by Levitan and Hirshberg [1] were used. Results seem to suggest that the effect of task role on prosodic entrainment was larger than any possible effects of group, suggesting that social factors affect prosodic entrainment behaviour more than individual differences in cognition or other factors. Conversely, lexical entrainment was not affected by task role or group. Importantly, no clear patterns in entrainment on different dimensions, levels, or features could be observed, highlighting the complex and multifaceted nature of entrainment.","PeriodicalId":442842,"journal":{"name":"Speech Prosody 2022","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Prosody 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2022-26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Entrainment refers to the tendency people have to speak more similarly during a conversation. Although entrainment has been observed frequently, the underlying mechanisms of the phe-nomenon are debated. A specific point of disagreement is the role of social or higher-order cognitive factors in entrainment. The present study aimed to explore prosodic and lexical entrainment in small groups of individuals with schizophrenia, a dis-order that has been associated with theory of mind impairments and social difficulties, and a control group without schizophrenia. All participants completed a referential communication task with an experimenter. To determine prosodic entrainment, the measures proposed by Levitan and Hirshberg [1] were used. Results seem to suggest that the effect of task role on prosodic entrainment was larger than any possible effects of group, suggesting that social factors affect prosodic entrainment behaviour more than individual differences in cognition or other factors. Conversely, lexical entrainment was not affected by task role or group. Importantly, no clear patterns in entrainment on different dimensions, levels, or features could be observed, highlighting the complex and multifaceted nature of entrainment.
有和没有精神分裂症的成人的韵律和词汇的干扰
“娱乐化”指的是人们在谈话中说话更加相似的趋势。虽然经常观察到夹带现象,但这一现象的潜在机制仍存在争议。一个具体的分歧点是社会或高阶认知因素在娱乐中的作用。本研究旨在探索精神分裂症患者(一种与心理障碍理论和社交困难相关的疾病)和非精神分裂症对照组的韵律和词汇参与情况。所有的参与者都完成了一项与实验者交流的任务。为了确定韵律蕴意,我们采用Levitan和Hirshberg[1]提出的测量方法。结果似乎表明,任务角色对韵律夹带行为的影响大于任何可能的群体影响,这表明社会因素对韵律夹带行为的影响大于个体认知差异或其他因素的影响。相反,词汇吸收不受任务角色或群体的影响。重要的是,在不同的维度、层次或特征上,没有观察到明显的夹带模式,突出了夹带的复杂性和多面性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信