Close Encounters: Staging Julius Caesar, Coriolanus and Antony and Cleopatra in contemporary South Africa

M. D. Waal
{"title":"Close Encounters: Staging Julius Caesar, Coriolanus and Antony and Cleopatra in contemporary South Africa","authors":"M. D. Waal","doi":"10.4314/SISA.V33I1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is there room, as Natasha Distiller asked in 2012, for a “close encounter” with Shakespeare in post-apartheid South Africa? This question has become increasingly pertinent. Following the Fallist movements which were ignited at universities across the country in 2015, calls for the decolonisation of curricula and cultural institutions have been coupled with growing resistance against pervading socio-economic inequalities. Amongst other things, the student protests represented a rejection of “old ways of reading” characterised in both ideological and material terms by  exclusion, lack of access and disempowerment. This article suggests that Distiller’s question may be engaged with reference to stage adaptations of Shakespeare’s plays in educational and/or academic settings which took  place before, during and after the student movements of 2015–16. These are two productions by the National  Children’s Theatre aimed at secondary school students – Coriolanus (2016) and Antony and Cleopatra (2018) – and two university productions: The Julius Caesar Project (2013) at the University of the Witwatersrand, and DCoriolanus (2017) at the University of Pretoria. Through close consideration of the strategies and decisions employed in staging these productions, the paper argues that the medium of theatre, and the ways in which it has been used by South African performers and theatre-makers, is key to understanding how both subversive and productive “close encounters” with Shakespeare might be enacted","PeriodicalId":334648,"journal":{"name":"Shakespeare in Southern Africa","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shakespeare in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/SISA.V33I1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is there room, as Natasha Distiller asked in 2012, for a “close encounter” with Shakespeare in post-apartheid South Africa? This question has become increasingly pertinent. Following the Fallist movements which were ignited at universities across the country in 2015, calls for the decolonisation of curricula and cultural institutions have been coupled with growing resistance against pervading socio-economic inequalities. Amongst other things, the student protests represented a rejection of “old ways of reading” characterised in both ideological and material terms by  exclusion, lack of access and disempowerment. This article suggests that Distiller’s question may be engaged with reference to stage adaptations of Shakespeare’s plays in educational and/or academic settings which took  place before, during and after the student movements of 2015–16. These are two productions by the National  Children’s Theatre aimed at secondary school students – Coriolanus (2016) and Antony and Cleopatra (2018) – and two university productions: The Julius Caesar Project (2013) at the University of the Witwatersrand, and DCoriolanus (2017) at the University of Pretoria. Through close consideration of the strategies and decisions employed in staging these productions, the paper argues that the medium of theatre, and the ways in which it has been used by South African performers and theatre-makers, is key to understanding how both subversive and productive “close encounters” with Shakespeare might be enacted
近距离接触:尤利乌斯·凯撒、科里奥兰纳斯、安东尼和克利奥帕特拉在当代南非的表演
正如娜塔莎·迪勒(Natasha Distiller)在2012年提出的那样,在后种族隔离时代的南非,与莎士比亚“近距离接触”还有空间吗?这个问题越来越切题了。继2015年在全国大学引发的Fallist运动之后,要求课程和文化机构非殖民化的呼声与对普遍存在的社会经济不平等的日益抵制相结合。除其他事项外,学生抗议活动代表了对“旧的阅读方式”的拒绝,这种方式在意识形态和物质方面都以排斥、缺乏接触和剥夺权力为特征。这篇文章表明,蒸馏器的问题可能与莎士比亚戏剧在2015-16学生运动之前、期间和之后在教育和/或学术背景下的舞台改编有关。这是国家儿童剧院针对中学生的两部作品——《科里奥兰纳斯》(2016年)和《安东尼与克利奥帕特拉》(2018年),以及两部大学作品:《朱利叶斯·凯撒计划》(2013年)在威特沃特斯兰德大学上演,《科里奥兰纳斯博士》(2017年)在比勒陀利亚大学上演。通过仔细考虑在上演这些作品时所采用的策略和决定,本文认为戏剧的媒介,以及南非表演者和戏剧制作人使用戏剧的方式,是理解如何与莎士比亚进行颠覆性和生产性“近距离接触”的关键
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信