Processing Narrative Coherence: Towards a Top-Down Model of Discourse

Erica Cosentino, I. Adornetti, F. Ferretti
{"title":"Processing Narrative Coherence: Towards a Top-Down Model of Discourse","authors":"Erica Cosentino, I. Adornetti, F. Ferretti","doi":"10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Models of discourse and narration elaborated within the classical \ncompositional framework have been characterized as bottom-up models, \naccording to which discourse analysis proceeds incrementally, from \nphrase and sentence local meaning to discourse global meaning. In this \npaper we will argue against these models. Assuming as a case study the \nissue of discourse coherence, we suggest that the assessment of \ncoherence is a top-down process, in which the construction of a \nsituational interpretation at the global meaning level guides local \nmeaning analysis. In support of our hypothesis, we explore the role of \nexecutive functions (brain functions involved in planning and \norganization of goal-oriented behaviors) in coherence's establishment, \ndiscussing the results of several studies on narrative abilities of \npatients with brain injuries. We suggest that, compared to other \nmodels of discourse processing focused on comprehension, our model is \na viable candidate for an integrated account of discourse \ncomprehension and production.","PeriodicalId":311534,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Models of discourse and narration elaborated within the classical compositional framework have been characterized as bottom-up models, according to which discourse analysis proceeds incrementally, from phrase and sentence local meaning to discourse global meaning. In this paper we will argue against these models. Assuming as a case study the issue of discourse coherence, we suggest that the assessment of coherence is a top-down process, in which the construction of a situational interpretation at the global meaning level guides local meaning analysis. In support of our hypothesis, we explore the role of executive functions (brain functions involved in planning and organization of goal-oriented behaviors) in coherence's establishment, discussing the results of several studies on narrative abilities of patients with brain injuries. We suggest that, compared to other models of discourse processing focused on comprehension, our model is a viable candidate for an integrated account of discourse comprehension and production.
加工叙事连贯:一种自上而下的话语模式
在经典作曲框架内阐述的话语和叙事模式具有自下而上模式的特点,话语分析从短语和句子的局部意义逐步进行到话语的整体意义。在本文中,我们将反对这些模型。以语篇连贯为例,我们认为连贯的评估是一个自上而下的过程,在这个过程中,在全球意义层面构建情景解释指导局部意义分析。为了支持我们的假设,我们探讨了执行功能(涉及目标导向行为的计划和组织的大脑功能)在连贯建立中的作用,讨论了几项关于脑损伤患者叙事能力的研究结果。我们认为,与其他专注于理解的话语处理模型相比,我们的模型是一个整合话语理解和生产的可行候选模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信