Efficacy of Regenerative Materials and Ultrasonic Ridge Splitting Technique with Simultaneous Implants Placement into Narrow Alveolar Ridge

A. Kamel, Ahmad Kassem Mohammad, Mohamad Fouad Edrees
{"title":"Efficacy of Regenerative Materials and Ultrasonic Ridge Splitting Technique with Simultaneous Implants Placement into Narrow Alveolar Ridge","authors":"A. Kamel, Ahmad Kassem Mohammad, Mohamad Fouad Edrees","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2019.60179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study compares clinically and radiographically between efficacies of two different bone graft materials with amniotic membrane in narrow alveolar ridges subjected to ridge expansion by ultrasonic bone surgery to receive simultaneous implant placement.  Subjects and Methods: Twenty-two systemically healthy patients with partial edentulous narrow anterior maxillary ridge classified randomly into the following equal groups: Group Ι patients with partial edentulous narrow ridge; treated by ridge splitting technique and simultaneous implant placement into their ridge; associated with deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss ®) and amniotic membrane. Group II patients with partial edentulous narrow ridge; treated by ridge splitting technique and simultaneous implant placement into their ridge; associated with hydroxyapatite and 40% beta-tricalcium phosphate (easy-graft™ crystal) and amniotic membrane. Evaluation of implant success rate was done, and the clinical parameters were recorded for all implants. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values was recorded. Efficacy of regenerative materials was observed by evaluation of marginal bone level and bone density. Results: Alveolar ridge width was increased in all groups. The mean value of alveolar ridge width in group I 3.64 mm ±0.3 at baseline that increased to 6.90mm ±0.6. The mean value of Alveolar ridge width in group II was 4.17 mm ±0.7at baseline that increased to 6.65 mm ±0.4. Group II showed the highest ISQ, bone density and the lowest marginal bone loss values after twelve months of implant placement. Conclusion:  The use of piezo-electric surgery with bone grafting as sole tool for ridge splitting is promising technique.","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2019.60179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: This study compares clinically and radiographically between efficacies of two different bone graft materials with amniotic membrane in narrow alveolar ridges subjected to ridge expansion by ultrasonic bone surgery to receive simultaneous implant placement.  Subjects and Methods: Twenty-two systemically healthy patients with partial edentulous narrow anterior maxillary ridge classified randomly into the following equal groups: Group Ι patients with partial edentulous narrow ridge; treated by ridge splitting technique and simultaneous implant placement into their ridge; associated with deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss ®) and amniotic membrane. Group II patients with partial edentulous narrow ridge; treated by ridge splitting technique and simultaneous implant placement into their ridge; associated with hydroxyapatite and 40% beta-tricalcium phosphate (easy-graft™ crystal) and amniotic membrane. Evaluation of implant success rate was done, and the clinical parameters were recorded for all implants. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values was recorded. Efficacy of regenerative materials was observed by evaluation of marginal bone level and bone density. Results: Alveolar ridge width was increased in all groups. The mean value of alveolar ridge width in group I 3.64 mm ±0.3 at baseline that increased to 6.90mm ±0.6. The mean value of Alveolar ridge width in group II was 4.17 mm ±0.7at baseline that increased to 6.65 mm ±0.4. Group II showed the highest ISQ, bone density and the lowest marginal bone loss values after twelve months of implant placement. Conclusion:  The use of piezo-electric surgery with bone grafting as sole tool for ridge splitting is promising technique.
再生材料与超声脊裂技术同时植入狭窄牙槽嵴的疗效
目的:比较两种不同的带羊膜的骨移植材料在狭窄肺泡脊上的临床和影像学效果,通过超声骨手术进行脊扩张,同时植入。对象与方法:22例全身健康的部分无牙狭窄上颌前嵴患者随机分为以下两组:Ι组部分无牙狭窄前嵴患者;采用脊裂术治疗,同时在脊内植入种植体;与脱蛋白牛骨(Bio-Oss®)和羊膜相关。II组患者部分无牙狭窄嵴;采用脊裂术治疗,同时在脊内植入种植体;与羟基磷灰石和40% -磷酸三钙(易接枝™晶体)和羊膜相关。评估种植成功率,记录所有种植体的临床参数。记录种植体稳定商(ISQ)值。通过评估边缘骨水平和骨密度来观察再生材料的效果。结果:各组牙槽嵴宽度均增加。ⅰ组牙槽嵴宽度平均值从基线的3.64 mm±0.3增加到6.90mm±0.6。ⅱ组牙槽嵴宽度平均值从基线4.17 mm±0.7增加到6.65 mm±0.4。II组植体12个月后ISQ、骨密度最高,边缘骨质流失值最低。结论:采用压电手术联合植骨作为唯一工具进行脊柱劈裂是一种很有前途的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信