{"title":"Few Notes on Inequality in Israel: The Causes Behind Inequality","authors":"K. Yanovskiy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3746659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Real Justice has nothing in common with redistribution and disgraceful ‘equity’, so we are discussing inequality as a purely economic problem. There are two sources of inequality in focus in this short paper. The first one is rooted in the level of risks accepted by business: if a significant part of entrepreneurs is ‘risk loving’ innovators who could both to lose big or, or to win big it inevitably results in relatively high inequality (as it is observable in the US economy – Acemoglu et al, 2012; Adam Smith). The second source of inequality is high barriers for entering markets protecting crony – capitalists. The latter is quite typical for some autocratic governments as well as for every economy plagued by socialist-like institutions (as a majority of Latin American countries and Israel with 'socially oriented' patron-client pyramids in broad use - De Soto, 2002).","PeriodicalId":169574,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Entry & Exit (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3746659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Real Justice has nothing in common with redistribution and disgraceful ‘equity’, so we are discussing inequality as a purely economic problem. There are two sources of inequality in focus in this short paper. The first one is rooted in the level of risks accepted by business: if a significant part of entrepreneurs is ‘risk loving’ innovators who could both to lose big or, or to win big it inevitably results in relatively high inequality (as it is observable in the US economy – Acemoglu et al, 2012; Adam Smith). The second source of inequality is high barriers for entering markets protecting crony – capitalists. The latter is quite typical for some autocratic governments as well as for every economy plagued by socialist-like institutions (as a majority of Latin American countries and Israel with 'socially oriented' patron-client pyramids in broad use - De Soto, 2002).
真正的正义与再分配和不体面的“公平”没有任何共同之处,所以我们把不平等作为一个纯粹的经济问题来讨论。在这篇短文中,有两个不平等的来源。第一个是植根于企业所接受的风险水平:如果很大一部分企业家是“热爱风险”的创新者,他们既可能损失惨重,也可能赢得惨重,那么不可避免地会导致相对较高的不平等(正如在美国经济中可以观察到的那样)——Acemoglu等人,2012;亚当•斯密(Adam Smith))。造成不平等的第二个原因是进入市场的高门槛保护了裙带资本家。后者对于一些专制政府以及每一个被类似社会主义制度困扰的经济体(如大多数拉丁美洲国家和以色列广泛使用“面向社会”的赞助人-客户金字塔- De Soto, 2002)来说是非常典型的。