The social epistemology of introspection

E. Unnsteinsson
{"title":"The social epistemology of introspection","authors":"E. Unnsteinsson","doi":"10.1111/mila.12438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I argue that introspection is a process which recruits the same mental mechanism as that which is required for the production of ordinary speech acts. In introspection, in e ect, we intentionally tell ourselves that we are in some mental state and our aim is, thereby, to produce belief or knowledge about that state in ourselves. However, if we accept a popular theory of speech acts—so-called ‘Gricean intentionalism’—this is precisely what speakers do when speaking to others, only the addressee is di erent. On this basis, I argue that every bias or epistemic risk discovered by social epistemology will be applicable to introspection and other forms of self-directed representation. If so, it becomes unclear in what sense social epistemology is ‘social,’ but, more importantly, this result suggests that the eld has been too narrowly construed and that its methods have direct application at the intrapersonal level.","PeriodicalId":110770,"journal":{"name":"Mind & Language","volume":"247 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mind & Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

I argue that introspection is a process which recruits the same mental mechanism as that which is required for the production of ordinary speech acts. In introspection, in e ect, we intentionally tell ourselves that we are in some mental state and our aim is, thereby, to produce belief or knowledge about that state in ourselves. However, if we accept a popular theory of speech acts—so-called ‘Gricean intentionalism’—this is precisely what speakers do when speaking to others, only the addressee is di erent. On this basis, I argue that every bias or epistemic risk discovered by social epistemology will be applicable to introspection and other forms of self-directed representation. If so, it becomes unclear in what sense social epistemology is ‘social,’ but, more importantly, this result suggests that the eld has been too narrowly construed and that its methods have direct application at the intrapersonal level.
内省的社会认识论
我认为,内省是一个过程,它吸收了与产生普通言语行为所需要的相同的心理机制。实际上,在内省中,我们有意地告诉自己,我们处于某种精神状态,我们的目的是,因此,产生关于我们自己这种状态的信念或知识。然而,如果我们接受一种流行的言语行为理论——所谓的“格林意向性”——这正是说话者在与他人交谈时所做的,只是收件人不同。在此基础上,我认为社会认识论发现的每一种偏见或认知风险都将适用于内省和其他形式的自我导向表征。如果是这样,社会认识论在什么意义上是“社会的”就变得不清楚了,但更重要的是,这一结果表明,该领域的解释过于狭隘,其方法在个人层面上有直接的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信