A Study on the Preliminary Analysis for the No-Gun Ri Massacre Documentation Strategy

You-Seung Kim, Ban-Dee Ryu
{"title":"A Study on the Preliminary Analysis for the No-Gun Ri Massacre Documentation Strategy","authors":"You-Seung Kim, Ban-Dee Ryu","doi":"10.14404/JKSARM.2015.15.4.173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study reports a preliminary analysis for the No-Gun Ri massacre documentation strategy based on Hackman and Wornow-Blewett's implementation model, as an appraisal and selection method for No-Gun Ri Digital Archives. It intends to review the theoretical background for this process, inlcuding a history of the No-Gun Ri massacre and the development of documentation strategy. From the theoretical analysis, this study identified the No Gun Ri documentation strategy processes in 5 categories: \"cooperative collecting\", \"collecting in specific areas\", \"identifing missing areas\" and \"advisory group\". With these 5 categories, this study discusses the application of the Hackman and Wornow-Blewett's implementation model in the No Gun Ri case and reviews the strategy's pros and cons. As a result, firstly, we classfy focusing groups into \"victims and bereaved family\", \"government\", \"civil society\", \"the press\" and \"literature and art\". Secondly, we also classify documentation categories into \"massacre records\", \"investigation activity records\" and \"cherish memory\".","PeriodicalId":344902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2015.15.4.173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study reports a preliminary analysis for the No-Gun Ri massacre documentation strategy based on Hackman and Wornow-Blewett's implementation model, as an appraisal and selection method for No-Gun Ri Digital Archives. It intends to review the theoretical background for this process, inlcuding a history of the No-Gun Ri massacre and the development of documentation strategy. From the theoretical analysis, this study identified the No Gun Ri documentation strategy processes in 5 categories: "cooperative collecting", "collecting in specific areas", "identifing missing areas" and "advisory group". With these 5 categories, this study discusses the application of the Hackman and Wornow-Blewett's implementation model in the No Gun Ri case and reviews the strategy's pros and cons. As a result, firstly, we classfy focusing groups into "victims and bereaved family", "government", "civil society", "the press" and "literature and art". Secondly, we also classify documentation categories into "massacre records", "investigation activity records" and "cherish memory".
芦郡里大屠杀文献策略初步分析研究
本研究基于Hackman和Wornow-Blewett的实施模型,对No-Gun Ri大屠杀文献策略进行初步分析,作为No-Gun Ri数字档案的评估和选择方法。它打算回顾这一过程的理论背景,包括老斤里大屠杀的历史和文献战略的发展。从理论分析出发,本研究将芦根里文献策略过程划分为“合作收集”、“特定区域收集”、“缺失区域识别”和“咨询小组”5类。通过这五个类别,本研究讨论了Hackman和Wornow-Blewett的实施模式在No Gun Ri案例中的应用,并回顾了该策略的利弊。因此,首先,我们将焦点群体分为“受害者和遗属”、“政府”、“公民社会”、“新闻界”和“文学艺术”。其次,我们还将文献分类为“大屠杀记录”、“调查活动记录”和“珍惜记忆”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信