Comparative Justice Accountability of Samen Leven Actors in Indonesia and Malaysia

Atha Difa Saputri, Ricky Julianto
{"title":"Comparative Justice Accountability of Samen Leven Actors in Indonesia and Malaysia","authors":"Atha Difa Saputri, Ricky Julianto","doi":"10.15294/ciils.v2i2.67671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of samen leven or cohabitation is a violation of the religious and cultural norms of Indonesian society, but semen leven is increasingly common in today's modern society, especially in Indonesia and Malaysia. The rise of this cohabitation shows a decline in moral and religious values ​​in society. Discussion in this article will cover various regulations related to semen leven or (cohabitation) included in the previous or new Criminal Code and discuss various polemics around them. Then it will also be discussed how legal, religious, and social perspectives are on the practice of semen leven and how the sanctions are imposed. The purpose of this paper is to understand the legal views governing the act of cohabitation as well as efforts to deal with the problem of samen leven in Indonesia by comparing and analyzing a comparison of the two views of the legal system that applies between Malaysia and Indonesia towards the practice of cohabitation. The approach research method that we use is carried out through a literature review and normative juridical methods using primary sources in this study in the form of the Criminal Code, Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage, the 1984 Islamic Family Law concerning marriage and divorce in Malaysia. Secondary sources in the form of all legal publications, including textbooks, legal dictionaries, legal journals, legal articles, and comments on court decisions. \nKEYWORDS: Samen Leven, Cohabitation, Legal Comparasion. \n ","PeriodicalId":112685,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ciils.v2i2.67671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practice of samen leven or cohabitation is a violation of the religious and cultural norms of Indonesian society, but semen leven is increasingly common in today's modern society, especially in Indonesia and Malaysia. The rise of this cohabitation shows a decline in moral and religious values ​​in society. Discussion in this article will cover various regulations related to semen leven or (cohabitation) included in the previous or new Criminal Code and discuss various polemics around them. Then it will also be discussed how legal, religious, and social perspectives are on the practice of semen leven and how the sanctions are imposed. The purpose of this paper is to understand the legal views governing the act of cohabitation as well as efforts to deal with the problem of samen leven in Indonesia by comparing and analyzing a comparison of the two views of the legal system that applies between Malaysia and Indonesia towards the practice of cohabitation. The approach research method that we use is carried out through a literature review and normative juridical methods using primary sources in this study in the form of the Criminal Code, Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage, the 1984 Islamic Family Law concerning marriage and divorce in Malaysia. Secondary sources in the form of all legal publications, including textbooks, legal dictionaries, legal journals, legal articles, and comments on court decisions. KEYWORDS: Samen Leven, Cohabitation, Legal Comparasion.  
印尼和马来西亚Samen Leven行为者的比较司法问责
同居的做法违反了印度尼西亚社会的宗教和文化规范,但在今天的现代社会,尤其是在印度尼西亚和马来西亚,精液水平越来越普遍。这种同居的增加表明了社会道德和宗教价值观的下降。本文将讨论新旧《刑法》中有关精液水平或同居的各种规定,并讨论围绕这些规定的各种争论。然后,还将讨论法律、宗教和社会观点如何看待精液水平的实践以及如何实施制裁。本文的目的是通过比较和分析马来西亚和印度尼西亚之间适用于同居实践的法律制度的两种观点的比较,了解管理同居行为的法律观点以及处理印度尼西亚同性恋问题的努力。我们使用的方法研究方法是通过文献综述和规范的司法方法进行的,本研究使用的主要来源是《刑法》、1974年关于婚姻的第1号法律、1984年关于马来西亚婚姻和离婚的伊斯兰家庭法。所有法律出版物形式的二手资料,包括教科书、法律词典、法律期刊、法律文章和法院判决评论。关键词:萨门·利文,同居,法律比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信