Epilogue

J. Donahue
{"title":"Epilogue","authors":"J. Donahue","doi":"10.14325/mississippi/9781496828637.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Homemaking, Fiona Barnes and Catherine Wiley assert that “women write in order to negotiate the tensions between definitions of home as a material space and home as an ideal place” (xix). As the works discussed illustrate, the writing and rewriting of home is often a journey in itself, a way of making sense of personal and inherited histories. For the characters, home is steeped with contradiction and can be a site of great tension. In many of the texts, home operates as a place of oppression as well as subversion. The realities of the characters’ lives counter a view of home as a place of freedom and security, and it is the act of flight that underscores the connection between trauma, migration, and social norms. The characters’ embodied and ideological transgressions in response to social convention render them exiles in or outside their homelands. As a result, the characters embrace change and pursue adaptive solutions to preserve selfhood in the face of violence, illness, and exclusion. These forces propel the characters’ migration, but trauma and shame do not define the narratives; rather, the protagonists’ navigation of trauma, oftentimes through dissociation and flight, foregrounds the emotional work that underlies and often precedes emigration. The authors position the characters’ homelands as spaces of individual and collective trauma and situate migration as the force that facilitates the protagonists’ homecoming. The works showcase women responding to challenges to safety with moves toward autonomy and self-determination....","PeriodicalId":247308,"journal":{"name":"Taking Flight","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taking Flight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14325/mississippi/9781496828637.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Homemaking, Fiona Barnes and Catherine Wiley assert that “women write in order to negotiate the tensions between definitions of home as a material space and home as an ideal place” (xix). As the works discussed illustrate, the writing and rewriting of home is often a journey in itself, a way of making sense of personal and inherited histories. For the characters, home is steeped with contradiction and can be a site of great tension. In many of the texts, home operates as a place of oppression as well as subversion. The realities of the characters’ lives counter a view of home as a place of freedom and security, and it is the act of flight that underscores the connection between trauma, migration, and social norms. The characters’ embodied and ideological transgressions in response to social convention render them exiles in or outside their homelands. As a result, the characters embrace change and pursue adaptive solutions to preserve selfhood in the face of violence, illness, and exclusion. These forces propel the characters’ migration, but trauma and shame do not define the narratives; rather, the protagonists’ navigation of trauma, oftentimes through dissociation and flight, foregrounds the emotional work that underlies and often precedes emigration. The authors position the characters’ homelands as spaces of individual and collective trauma and situate migration as the force that facilitates the protagonists’ homecoming. The works showcase women responding to challenges to safety with moves toward autonomy and self-determination....
后记
菲奥娜·巴恩斯(Fiona Barnes)和凯瑟琳·威利(Catherine Wiley)在《家政》(Homemaking)一书中声称,“女性写作是为了协调家作为物质空间和家作为理想场所的定义之间的紧张关系”(19)。正如所讨论的作品所表明的那样,对家的书写和改写往往本身就是一段旅程,是一种理解个人和继承历史的方式。对于角色来说,家充满了矛盾,可能是一个非常紧张的地方。在许多文本中,家既是压迫的地方,也是颠覆的地方。书中人物的现实生活与家是一个自由和安全的地方的观点背道而驰,正是逃跑的行为强调了创伤、迁徙和社会规范之间的联系。这些人物对社会习俗的体现和意识形态上的越轨行为使他们在故土内外流亡。因此,在面对暴力、疾病和排斥时,角色们拥抱变化,追求适应性解决方案,以保持自我。这些力量推动了人物的迁移,但创伤和羞耻并没有定义叙事;相反,主人公对创伤的导航,通常是通过分离和逃跑,突显了移民背后和移民之前的情感工作。作者将人物的家乡定位为个人和集体创伤的空间,并将移民定位为促进主人公回家的力量。这些作品展示了女性以自主和自决的方式应对安全挑战....
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信