Learning to Learn: Critical Thinking Skills to Help Students for Life

Cristina Tripon
{"title":"Learning to Learn: Critical Thinking Skills to Help Students for Life","authors":"Cristina Tripon","doi":"10.18662/LUMENPHS/06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the last two decades, critical thinking has become imperative for integrated students at the workplace. Critical thinking includes the component skills of analyzing arguments, making inferences using inductive or deductive reasoning, judging or evaluating, making decisions or solving problems. Involves both cognitive skills and dispositions, which can be seen as attitudes or habits of mind, include flexibility, a propensity to seek reason, a desire to be well informed, a respect for and willingness to entertain different viewpoints. This paper describes a study to investigate the impact of critical thinking strategies applied to work with students, to develop critical thinking skills. The research was conducted about 6 months, in a technical university, focuses on developing critical thinking skills in part by using complex contextualized problems. Upon conclusion of the study and analysis of the data, we observed significant gain in those skills, measured with the standard instrument: Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA). The WGCTA has been used to compare students on entry and exit program, make comparisons between different levels and investigate the correlation between critical thinking and variables. All test items include problems and arguments based on situations experienced in the daily workplace, classrooms, social media and others. The tool has five subsets designed to evaluate different elements of critical thinking, comprise deduction, inference, the relevance of assumptions, interpretation, and evaluation of arguments.","PeriodicalId":117939,"journal":{"name":"Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Philosophy & Humanistic Science","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Philosophy & Humanistic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/LUMENPHS/06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the last two decades, critical thinking has become imperative for integrated students at the workplace. Critical thinking includes the component skills of analyzing arguments, making inferences using inductive or deductive reasoning, judging or evaluating, making decisions or solving problems. Involves both cognitive skills and dispositions, which can be seen as attitudes or habits of mind, include flexibility, a propensity to seek reason, a desire to be well informed, a respect for and willingness to entertain different viewpoints. This paper describes a study to investigate the impact of critical thinking strategies applied to work with students, to develop critical thinking skills. The research was conducted about 6 months, in a technical university, focuses on developing critical thinking skills in part by using complex contextualized problems. Upon conclusion of the study and analysis of the data, we observed significant gain in those skills, measured with the standard instrument: Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA). The WGCTA has been used to compare students on entry and exit program, make comparisons between different levels and investigate the correlation between critical thinking and variables. All test items include problems and arguments based on situations experienced in the daily workplace, classrooms, social media and others. The tool has five subsets designed to evaluate different elements of critical thinking, comprise deduction, inference, the relevance of assumptions, interpretation, and evaluation of arguments.
学会学习:帮助学生终身的批判性思维技能
在过去的二十年里,批判性思维已经成为工作场所综合型学生的必备技能。批判性思维包括分析论点、使用归纳或演绎推理、判断或评估、做出决定或解决问题的组成技能。包括认知技能和性格,这可以看作是思维的态度或习惯,包括灵活性,寻求理性的倾向,对充分了解的渴望,对不同观点的尊重和接受的意愿。本文描述了一项研究,旨在调查批判性思维策略对学生工作的影响,以培养批判性思维技能。这项研究在一所技术大学进行了大约6个月,重点是通过使用复杂的情境问题来培养批判性思维能力。根据研究和数据分析的结论,我们观察到这些技能的显著提高,用标准工具测量:沃森格拉泽批判性思维评估(WGCTA)。WGCTA被用来比较学生的入学和退学计划,在不同的水平之间进行比较,并调查批判性思维与变量之间的相关性。所有测试项目都包括基于日常工作场所、教室、社交媒体和其他场合所经历的情况的问题和争论。该工具有五个子集,旨在评估批判性思维的不同元素,包括演绎、推理、假设的相关性、解释和论证的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信