Effect of prebiotic supplementation on productive traits, carcass characteristics, and meat quality in growing broiler during the starter period

A. Askri, A. Raach-Moujahed, N. M’Hamdi, Z. Maalaoui, H. Debbabi
{"title":"Effect of prebiotic supplementation on productive traits, carcass characteristics, and meat quality in growing broiler during the starter period","authors":"A. Askri, A. Raach-Moujahed, N. M’Hamdi, Z. Maalaoui, H. Debbabi","doi":"10.46325/gabj.v6i2.265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the effect of the inclusion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-derived prebiotic, on broiler’s diets as a potential substitute for antibiotics growth promoters (AGPs) in poultry production, on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of broiler chickens. For a total of 224 (-1 days old) Arbor Acres chickens of either sex were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments each consisting of seven replicates and each replicates having 8 birds/ cage.  The experiment duration was 42 days. The dietary treatments were (P0) The birds were fed a basal diet without prebiotic, (P1) basal diet with 1g of prebiotic, (P2) basal diet with 1.5g of prebiotic, and (P3) basal diet with 2g of prebiotic. Average weight (AW), Daily Weight Gain (DWG), FI (Feed Intake), Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), Mortality Rate (MR), hot and cold carcass weight, yield, and muscle weights were measured. Meat quality was evaluated by determining the pH and color values of the CIE Lab Color System. A sensory analysis was performed. Results showed no significant difference in growth performance (P>0.05). Indeed, the control group had a significantly higher BW compared with experimental treatments P1, P2, and P3. Furthermore, broiler DWG did not differ (P>0.05) between the control and the experimental groups. Likewise, no significant differences were observed between treatments regarding FI, FCR, and mortality (P>0.05). The overall mortality rate during the experimental period was low in the control group (0%) compared to the group fed prebiotic (0.2%). No significant effect was observed regarding pH 30 min and ultimate pH (P>0.05). However, a significant difference has occurred in the meat color (P= 0.03). Therefore, meat quality showed no alteration when prebiotic was added during the starter period. It was concluded that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae-derived prebiotic added to the broiler diet at doses up to 2g/kg during the starter period did not improve performance, but could maintain meat quality. Further investigations are needed to clarify the effect of duration prebiotics administration on meat quality in broiler chickens.","PeriodicalId":321295,"journal":{"name":"Genetics & Biodiversity Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics & Biodiversity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46325/gabj.v6i2.265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of the inclusion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-derived prebiotic, on broiler’s diets as a potential substitute for antibiotics growth promoters (AGPs) in poultry production, on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of broiler chickens. For a total of 224 (-1 days old) Arbor Acres chickens of either sex were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments each consisting of seven replicates and each replicates having 8 birds/ cage.  The experiment duration was 42 days. The dietary treatments were (P0) The birds were fed a basal diet without prebiotic, (P1) basal diet with 1g of prebiotic, (P2) basal diet with 1.5g of prebiotic, and (P3) basal diet with 2g of prebiotic. Average weight (AW), Daily Weight Gain (DWG), FI (Feed Intake), Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), Mortality Rate (MR), hot and cold carcass weight, yield, and muscle weights were measured. Meat quality was evaluated by determining the pH and color values of the CIE Lab Color System. A sensory analysis was performed. Results showed no significant difference in growth performance (P>0.05). Indeed, the control group had a significantly higher BW compared with experimental treatments P1, P2, and P3. Furthermore, broiler DWG did not differ (P>0.05) between the control and the experimental groups. Likewise, no significant differences were observed between treatments regarding FI, FCR, and mortality (P>0.05). The overall mortality rate during the experimental period was low in the control group (0%) compared to the group fed prebiotic (0.2%). No significant effect was observed regarding pH 30 min and ultimate pH (P>0.05). However, a significant difference has occurred in the meat color (P= 0.03). Therefore, meat quality showed no alteration when prebiotic was added during the starter period. It was concluded that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae-derived prebiotic added to the broiler diet at doses up to 2g/kg during the starter period did not improve performance, but could maintain meat quality. Further investigations are needed to clarify the effect of duration prebiotics administration on meat quality in broiler chickens.
益生元添加对发酵期生长肉鸡生产性状、胴体特性和肉品质的影响
本研究旨在探讨在肉鸡饲粮中添加酿酒酵母衍生的益生元,作为家禽生产中抗生素生长促进剂(AGPs)的潜在替代品,对肉鸡生产性能、胴体特性和肉品质的影响。试验选取224只(-1日龄)爱拔益加鸡,随机分为4个饲粮处理,每个处理设7个重复,每个重复8只/笼。试验期42 d。饲喂不含益生元的基础饲粮,(P1)基础饲粮中添加益生元1g, (P2)基础饲粮中添加1.5g, (P3)基础饲粮中添加益生元2g。测定平均体重(AW)、日增重(DWG)、采食量(FI)、饲料系数(FCR)、死亡率(MR)、热胴体重、冷胴体重、产量和肌肉质量。通过测定CIE实验室颜色系统的pH值和颜色值来评估肉的品质。进行了感官分析。结果各组生长性能无显著差异(P>0.05)。事实上,与实验处理P1、P2和P3相比,对照组的体重明显更高。对照组与试验组肉鸡体重无显著差异(P>0.05)。同样,在FI、FCR和死亡率方面,两组间无显著差异(P>0.05)。试验期对照组的总死亡率(0%)低于饲喂益生元组(0.2%)。pH 30min和最终pH无显著影响(P>0.05)。然而,肉的颜色发生了显著差异(P= 0.03)。因此,在发酵期添加益生元对肉质没有影响。综上所述,在发酵期饲粮中添加2g/kg的酿酒酵母源益生元不能提高肉鸡生产性能,但能保持肉质。需要进一步的研究来阐明长期使用益生元对肉鸡肉品质的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信