Comparison of age estimates from otoliths, vertebrae, and pectoral spines in African sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell)

Shahista Khan, M. A. Khan, K. Miyan
{"title":"Comparison of age estimates from otoliths, vertebrae, and pectoral spines in African sharptooth catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell)","authors":"Shahista Khan, M. A. Khan, K. Miyan","doi":"10.3176/ECO.2011.3.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Otoliths, vertebrae, and pectoral fin spine sections were compared to ascertain the best ageing structure in Clarias gariepinus. Standard procedures were followed to prepare and study the age structures. All ageing structures showed alternating opaque and translucent bands that were interpreted as annuli. Age estimates were evaluated for comparison between readers and among structures. Among all structures otoliths showed highest (95.6%) agreement between readers, followed by vertebrae (91.2%) and pectoral spine sections (79.7%). Due to the highest values of percent agreement and lowest average percent error and coefficient of variation values between two readers, otoliths were considered to be the most suitable structure for ageing C. gariepinus. When otoliths' ages were compared with other bony structures, viz. vertebrae and pectoral spine sections, the highest percent agreement and lowest average percent error and coefficient of variation values were found between otoliths and vertebrae age estimates (90.7%). Mean age estimates from otoliths were comparable (P > 0.05) to the values obtained from vertebrae but significantly (P < 0.05) different to those from pectoral fin spine sections.","PeriodicalId":262667,"journal":{"name":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/ECO.2011.3.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Otoliths, vertebrae, and pectoral fin spine sections were compared to ascertain the best ageing structure in Clarias gariepinus. Standard procedures were followed to prepare and study the age structures. All ageing structures showed alternating opaque and translucent bands that were interpreted as annuli. Age estimates were evaluated for comparison between readers and among structures. Among all structures otoliths showed highest (95.6%) agreement between readers, followed by vertebrae (91.2%) and pectoral spine sections (79.7%). Due to the highest values of percent agreement and lowest average percent error and coefficient of variation values between two readers, otoliths were considered to be the most suitable structure for ageing C. gariepinus. When otoliths' ages were compared with other bony structures, viz. vertebrae and pectoral spine sections, the highest percent agreement and lowest average percent error and coefficient of variation values were found between otoliths and vertebrae age estimates (90.7%). Mean age estimates from otoliths were comparable (P > 0.05) to the values obtained from vertebrae but significantly (P < 0.05) different to those from pectoral fin spine sections.
非洲尖牙鲶鱼耳石、椎骨和胸骨的年龄估计比较
比较了耳石、椎骨和胸鳍脊柱切片,以确定克拉利亚鱼的最佳老化结构。按照标准程序准备和研究年龄结构。所有老化的结构都显示出交替的不透明和半透明带,这被解释为环空。对读者之间和结构之间的年龄估计进行了评估。在所有结构中,读者对耳石的一致性最高(95.6%),其次是椎骨(91.2%)和胸椎(79.7%)。由于两种读卡器的一致性百分比最高,平均误差百分比和变异系数值最低,因此认为耳石是最适合老化的沙棘鱼结构。当耳石的年龄与其他骨结构(即椎骨和胸椎切片)进行比较时,耳石和椎骨年龄估计值之间的一致性最高,平均误差和变异系数最低(90.7%)。耳石测得的平均年龄与椎骨测得的年龄相当(P > 0.05),但与胸鳍测得的年龄差异显著(P < 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信