Protecting Freedom of Testation: A Proposal for Law Reform

E. Hosemann
{"title":"Protecting Freedom of Testation: A Proposal for Law Reform","authors":"E. Hosemann","doi":"10.36646/mjlr.47.2.protecting","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article addresses a problem ever more pressing in wealthy and aging societies like the United States: interference with freedom of testation by the use of wrongful means such as undue influence or will forgery to acquire benefits through inheritance. A detailed analysis of the remedies against interference with freedom of testation under inheritance law, tort law, and equity reveals that there is currently a significant under-deterrence of this undesirable behavior. Hence, this Article proposes a new remedy in order to protect freedom of testation more effectively: a disinheritance statute barring wrongdoers that have infringed upon someone’s freedom of testation from inheriting from their victims, not unlike the slayer statutes adopted by many state legislators in order to deal with “murdering heirs.” This statutory prohibition against inheritance in cases of interference with freedom of testation would do more than alleviate the identified under-deterrence problem. The proposed legislative reform would also conform with an important principle of American law: the idea that no one should profit from his wrongdoing. In addition, arguments in favour of the suggested proposal can be made by reference to the general trend towards a behavior-based inheritance regime and in view of the availability of similar rules in jurisdictions outside the United States.","PeriodicalId":194580,"journal":{"name":"Max Planck Institute for Comparative & International Private Law Research Paper Series","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Planck Institute for Comparative & International Private Law Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.47.2.protecting","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Article addresses a problem ever more pressing in wealthy and aging societies like the United States: interference with freedom of testation by the use of wrongful means such as undue influence or will forgery to acquire benefits through inheritance. A detailed analysis of the remedies against interference with freedom of testation under inheritance law, tort law, and equity reveals that there is currently a significant under-deterrence of this undesirable behavior. Hence, this Article proposes a new remedy in order to protect freedom of testation more effectively: a disinheritance statute barring wrongdoers that have infringed upon someone’s freedom of testation from inheriting from their victims, not unlike the slayer statutes adopted by many state legislators in order to deal with “murdering heirs.” This statutory prohibition against inheritance in cases of interference with freedom of testation would do more than alleviate the identified under-deterrence problem. The proposed legislative reform would also conform with an important principle of American law: the idea that no one should profit from his wrongdoing. In addition, arguments in favour of the suggested proposal can be made by reference to the general trend towards a behavior-based inheritance regime and in view of the availability of similar rules in jurisdictions outside the United States.
保护遗嘱自由:一项法律改革建议
在美国这样的富裕和老龄化社会中,这一条款解决了一个更为紧迫的问题:利用不当影响或伪造遗嘱等不正当手段通过继承获取利益,从而干扰遗嘱自由。详细分析继承法、侵权法和衡平法对干涉遗嘱自由的救济可以发现,目前对这种不良行为的威慑力度明显不足。因此,为了更有效地保护作证自由,本文提出了一种新的补救办法:制定剥夺继承权法,禁止侵犯他人作证自由的不法行为者从受害者那里继承遗产,这与许多州立法者为处理“谋杀继承人”而采用的杀人法没有什么不同。在干涉遗嘱自由的情况下禁止继承的这一法定禁令,不仅可以减轻所确定的威慑不足问题。拟议的立法改革也将符合美国法律的一个重要原则:任何人都不应从他的不法行为中获利。此外,赞成所建议的提案的理由可以参考以行为为基础的继承制度的总趋势,并考虑到美国以外的司法管辖区也有类似的规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信