Identification of Land Fire Risk Areas with Random Forest Using Landsat Image Data 8 OLI

Grandy Umbu Endalu Radandima Radandima
{"title":"Identification of Land Fire Risk Areas with Random Forest Using Landsat Image Data 8 OLI","authors":"Grandy Umbu Endalu Radandima Radandima","doi":"10.23887/ijnse.v6i2.48686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Land fire is a complex and serious problem affecting several human life sectors. Stimulating the occurrence of land fires caused by long dry seasons and erratic rainy seasons causes plants to dry up and die. Illegal land burning by irresponsible people for expansion and other interests. This study uses quantitative methods. The variables used are vegetation index values ​​obtained from Landsat 8 OLI images. The result of this research is that data classified using the random forest algorithm at RStudio produces a default number of 500 trees, and the number of variables tested in each split is 2. So, the estimated error rate of 2 out of the bag is 0.47%. Prediction and confusion matrix - train 403 data are less risky \"0\" (middle risk) of a fire, and there are 22 data of high risk of \"1\" (high risk) of a fire, with an accuracy value of 0.9914, 1. While the second prediction of the confusion matrix - test data, there are 167 data less risky \"0\" (middle risk) of fire. There is 1 data with a high risk of “1” (high risk) of a fire. There are seven high-risk data \"1\" (high risk) of fire, with an accuracy value of 0.9943, indicating a more accurate assessment of model accuracy, and the range is still good, around 96% to 99%. There are several incorrect classifications in the prediction and confusion matrix – train, which is slightly higher than the predictions of the two-confusion matrix – test, and sensitivity: 1.0000, which is the same in both prediction and confusion matrix – train & tes.","PeriodicalId":181108,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Natural Science and Engineering","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Natural Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/ijnse.v6i2.48686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land fire is a complex and serious problem affecting several human life sectors. Stimulating the occurrence of land fires caused by long dry seasons and erratic rainy seasons causes plants to dry up and die. Illegal land burning by irresponsible people for expansion and other interests. This study uses quantitative methods. The variables used are vegetation index values ​​obtained from Landsat 8 OLI images. The result of this research is that data classified using the random forest algorithm at RStudio produces a default number of 500 trees, and the number of variables tested in each split is 2. So, the estimated error rate of 2 out of the bag is 0.47%. Prediction and confusion matrix - train 403 data are less risky "0" (middle risk) of a fire, and there are 22 data of high risk of "1" (high risk) of a fire, with an accuracy value of 0.9914, 1. While the second prediction of the confusion matrix - test data, there are 167 data less risky "0" (middle risk) of fire. There is 1 data with a high risk of “1” (high risk) of a fire. There are seven high-risk data "1" (high risk) of fire, with an accuracy value of 0.9943, indicating a more accurate assessment of model accuracy, and the range is still good, around 96% to 99%. There are several incorrect classifications in the prediction and confusion matrix – train, which is slightly higher than the predictions of the two-confusion matrix – test, and sensitivity: 1.0000, which is the same in both prediction and confusion matrix – train & tes.
基于Landsat图像数据的随机森林识别陆地火险区域
土地火灾是一个复杂而严重的问题,影响到人类生活的多个领域。由于长时间的旱季和不稳定的雨季导致土地火灾的发生,导致植物干涸和死亡。不负责任的人为了扩张和其他利益而非法焚烧土地。本研究采用定量方法。使用的变量是从Landsat 8 OLI图像获得的植被指数值。本研究的结果是,在RStudio中使用随机森林算法分类的数据产生了500棵树的默认数量,并且在每次分割中测试的变量数量为2。所以,袋子里2个的估计错误率是0.47%。预测和混淆矩阵-训练403数据为火灾风险“0”(中风险)较小的数据,火灾风险“1”(高风险)较高的数据有22个,准确率值为0.9914,1。而第二次预测的混淆矩阵-测试数据中,有167个数据风险较小“0”(中风险)的火灾。有1个数据具有“1”(高风险)的火灾风险。火灾高风险数据“1”(高风险)有7个,准确率值为0.9943,说明对模型准确率的评估比较准确,范围仍然不错,在96% ~ 99%左右。预测和混淆矩阵-训练中有几个分类错误,略高于双混淆矩阵-测试的预测,灵敏度为1.0000,预测和混淆矩阵-训练&测试的灵敏度相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信