Determination of Clinical Profile and Causality of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions among Patients Attending Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in South India

Archana Mavoori, S. Bala, S. Pamar, K. Podila, D. Sriram
{"title":"Determination of Clinical Profile and Causality of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions among Patients Attending Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in South India","authors":"Archana Mavoori, S. Bala, S. Pamar, K. Podila, D. Sriram","doi":"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v12/11252d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cutaneous adverse drug reaction (CADR) is any undesirable change in the structure or function of the skin and its appendages related to drug eruption regardless of the aetiology is called the. CADRs manifest with diverse morphological pattern ranging from trivial urticaria to severe forms such as SJS, TEN vasculitis which can be fatal. They are called as non severe CADRs and CADRs respectively. \nIdentifying the responsible drug in this new era of enhanced multi-drug research is a difficult undertaking, but it can help prevent more issues and provide safer medications. \nObjective: The goal of this study was to determine the clinical profile and aetiology of CADR in patients in a tertiary care hospital in Hyderabad. \nMethods: A 6-month observational hospital-based study was conducted among patients attending the dermatological OPD of a medical college and hospital in Hyderabad.Patients with probable drug-related cutaneous lesions were included in the study, and the substance responsible for the lesions was determined. Recent drug history was recorded in a format prescribed by the Indian National Pharmacovigilance Programme, and causality was determined using WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) criteria. \nResults: Males (52.4%) and females (52.4%) made up the study population (47.6 percent ).The majority of them were between the ages of 51 and 60.Urticaria (19.05 percent), erythema multiforme (17.46 percent), and morbilliform rash were the most prevalent CADR patterns observed (17.46 percent ).Antibiotics (39 percent), NSIADs (26 percent), and ATT were the most commonly used medications for these responses (18 percent ). \nConclusions: CADRs, both severe and non-severe, cause significant morbidity in industrial employees, and the importance of pharmacovigilance should be emphasised even more to prevent such reactions. \nThe necessity of the hour is to identify such reactions quickly using skin tests and dermatoscopy..","PeriodicalId":118581,"journal":{"name":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 12","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 12","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v12/11252d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cutaneous adverse drug reaction (CADR) is any undesirable change in the structure or function of the skin and its appendages related to drug eruption regardless of the aetiology is called the. CADRs manifest with diverse morphological pattern ranging from trivial urticaria to severe forms such as SJS, TEN vasculitis which can be fatal. They are called as non severe CADRs and CADRs respectively. Identifying the responsible drug in this new era of enhanced multi-drug research is a difficult undertaking, but it can help prevent more issues and provide safer medications. Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the clinical profile and aetiology of CADR in patients in a tertiary care hospital in Hyderabad. Methods: A 6-month observational hospital-based study was conducted among patients attending the dermatological OPD of a medical college and hospital in Hyderabad.Patients with probable drug-related cutaneous lesions were included in the study, and the substance responsible for the lesions was determined. Recent drug history was recorded in a format prescribed by the Indian National Pharmacovigilance Programme, and causality was determined using WHO-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) criteria. Results: Males (52.4%) and females (52.4%) made up the study population (47.6 percent ).The majority of them were between the ages of 51 and 60.Urticaria (19.05 percent), erythema multiforme (17.46 percent), and morbilliform rash were the most prevalent CADR patterns observed (17.46 percent ).Antibiotics (39 percent), NSIADs (26 percent), and ATT were the most commonly used medications for these responses (18 percent ). Conclusions: CADRs, both severe and non-severe, cause significant morbidity in industrial employees, and the importance of pharmacovigilance should be emphasised even more to prevent such reactions. The necessity of the hour is to identify such reactions quickly using skin tests and dermatoscopy..
南印度三级护理教学医院患者皮肤药物不良反应的临床特征和因果关系的测定
背景:皮肤药物不良反应(CADR)是指与药物疹有关的皮肤及其附属物的结构或功能的任何不良变化,与病因无关。cadr表现为多种形态,从轻微的荨麻疹到严重的SJS、TEN血管炎等可致命的形式。它们分别被称为非严重cadr和cadr。在这个加强多药物研究的新时代,确定负责任的药物是一项艰巨的任务,但它可以帮助预防更多问题并提供更安全的药物。目的:本研究的目的是确定海德拉巴一家三级保健医院患者的CADR的临床特征和病因学。方法:在海德拉巴一所医学院和医院皮肤科门诊就诊的患者中进行了为期6个月的以医院为基础的观察研究。可能有药物相关皮肤病变的患者被纳入研究,并确定了导致病变的物质。以印度国家药物警戒规划规定的格式记录了近期用药史,并根据世卫组织-乌普萨拉监测中心(WHO-UMC)的标准确定了因果关系。结果:男性占52.4%,女性占52.4%,占47.6%。他们中的大多数年龄在51岁到60岁之间。荨麻疹(19.05%)、多形性红斑(17.46%)和麻疹型皮疹是观察到的最常见的CADR模式(17.46%)。抗生素(39%)、NSIADs(26%)和ATT是这些反应最常用的药物(18%)。结论:cadr不论是严重的还是非严重的,在工业从业人员中都有显著的发病率,应更加强调药物警戒的重要性,以防止此类反应的发生。当务之急是通过皮肤试验和皮肤镜检查来快速识别这些反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信