An Evaluation of Efficient Leader Election Algorithms for Crash-Recovery Systems

Carlos Gómez-Calzado, M. Larrea, Iratxe Soraluze Arriola, A. Lafuente, Roberto Cortiñas
{"title":"An Evaluation of Efficient Leader Election Algorithms for Crash-Recovery Systems","authors":"Carlos Gómez-Calzado, M. Larrea, Iratxe Soraluze Arriola, A. Lafuente, Roberto Cortiñas","doi":"10.1109/PDP.2013.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an evaluation of three communication-efficient algorithms implementing the Omega class of failure detectors, which provides an eventual leader election functionality, in distributed systems where processes can crash and recover. Communication efficiency means that eventually only a correct process, i.e., the elected leader, keeps sending a message periodically to the rest of processes. The first algorithm relies on the use of stable storage to store the identity of the leader and an incarnation number. The second algorithm does not use stable storage, but requires a majority of correct processes. Also, it is near-communication-efficient, since besides the leader, unstable processes, i.e., those that crash and recover infinitely often, may send messages periodically before they receive a message from the leader. Finally, the third algorithm does neither use stable storage nor require a majority of correct processes, but assumes that each process has access to a nondecreasing and persistent local clock. Using the OMNeT++ network simulation framework, we evaluate the performance and the quality of service provided by these algorithms, in terms of the number of messages exchanged among processes and the capability of the failure detector to provide a single leader, respectively.","PeriodicalId":202977,"journal":{"name":"2013 21st Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 21st Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP.2013.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation of three communication-efficient algorithms implementing the Omega class of failure detectors, which provides an eventual leader election functionality, in distributed systems where processes can crash and recover. Communication efficiency means that eventually only a correct process, i.e., the elected leader, keeps sending a message periodically to the rest of processes. The first algorithm relies on the use of stable storage to store the identity of the leader and an incarnation number. The second algorithm does not use stable storage, but requires a majority of correct processes. Also, it is near-communication-efficient, since besides the leader, unstable processes, i.e., those that crash and recover infinitely often, may send messages periodically before they receive a message from the leader. Finally, the third algorithm does neither use stable storage nor require a majority of correct processes, but assumes that each process has access to a nondecreasing and persistent local clock. Using the OMNeT++ network simulation framework, we evaluate the performance and the quality of service provided by these algorithms, in terms of the number of messages exchanged among processes and the capability of the failure detector to provide a single leader, respectively.
一种用于崩溃恢复系统的有效领导者选举算法的评估
本文提出了对实现Omega类故障检测器的三种通信高效算法的评估,该算法在进程可以崩溃和恢复的分布式系统中提供了最终的领导者选举功能。通信效率意味着最终只有一个正确的进程,即当选的领导,会定期向其他进程发送消息。第一种算法依赖于使用稳定存储来存储领导者的身份和化身号码。第二种算法不使用稳定存储,但需要大多数正确的进程。此外,它是接近通信效率的,因为除了leader之外,不稳定的进程,即那些崩溃和无限频繁恢复的进程,可能会在从leader接收消息之前周期性地发送消息。最后,第三种算法既不使用稳定的存储,也不需要大多数正确的进程,但假设每个进程都可以访问一个不减少且持久的本地时钟。使用omnet++网络仿真框架,我们分别根据进程之间交换的消息数量和故障检测器提供单个leader的能力来评估这些算法提供的性能和服务质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信