An Analysis of Injury Patterns for Drivers Based on Police Reported Frontal Crashes in Malaysia

M. Noordin, H. Osman, H. A. Aziz, N. Rosli, M. Widia, E. H. Sukadarin, N. S. Fauzan, H. Zadry, A. A. Ab. Rashid
{"title":"An Analysis of Injury Patterns for Drivers Based on Police Reported Frontal Crashes in Malaysia","authors":"M. Noordin, H. Osman, H. A. Aziz, N. Rosli, M. Widia, E. H. Sukadarin, N. S. Fauzan, H. Zadry, A. A. Ab. Rashid","doi":"10.56381/jsaem.v5i3.189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nMost Southeast Asian countries including Malaysia have a relatively high number of traffic fatalities involving occupants of 4-wheel vehicles. The frontal impact collisions have been identified as the cause of most passenger vehicle occupant deaths. Therefore, a better understanding of real-world frontal crashes is needed in support of decision-making processes for future frontal crash test programs. One of the important elements to examine is the occupant injury patterns based on real-world crashes. Furthermore, different frontal crash configurations may result in different levels of injury severity. The objective of this study is to analyze the driver injury and body part injury levels based on police-reported frontal crashes in Malaysia. Road crash cases from 2015 to 2019 were obtained from Bukit Aman Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department (JSPT), Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM). 81% of the cases comprised frontal crashes (full width & offset) while the rest involved sideswipe cases. Most of the drivers sustained no injury (70.77%) whereas 11.11%, 8.77%, and 6.87% suffered fatal injury, injury, and severe injury, respectively. The most frequent fatal cases among drivers involved injuries to multiple body regions for both configurations. The chi-square test revealed a significant association between the frontal crash configuration and driver injury level. The average odds ratio for fatality in frontal crashes compared to sideswipe configurations was 6.29. The rate of driver fatality per one crash has also increased marginally over the years. The study findings provide some information to support the recommendation that a full-width configuration is considered in future ASEAN NCAP frontal crash tests. Further research is also needed to fully understand real-world frontal crash impacts in Malaysia. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":286928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56381/jsaem.v5i3.189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most Southeast Asian countries including Malaysia have a relatively high number of traffic fatalities involving occupants of 4-wheel vehicles. The frontal impact collisions have been identified as the cause of most passenger vehicle occupant deaths. Therefore, a better understanding of real-world frontal crashes is needed in support of decision-making processes for future frontal crash test programs. One of the important elements to examine is the occupant injury patterns based on real-world crashes. Furthermore, different frontal crash configurations may result in different levels of injury severity. The objective of this study is to analyze the driver injury and body part injury levels based on police-reported frontal crashes in Malaysia. Road crash cases from 2015 to 2019 were obtained from Bukit Aman Traffic Investigation and Enforcement Department (JSPT), Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM). 81% of the cases comprised frontal crashes (full width & offset) while the rest involved sideswipe cases. Most of the drivers sustained no injury (70.77%) whereas 11.11%, 8.77%, and 6.87% suffered fatal injury, injury, and severe injury, respectively. The most frequent fatal cases among drivers involved injuries to multiple body regions for both configurations. The chi-square test revealed a significant association between the frontal crash configuration and driver injury level. The average odds ratio for fatality in frontal crashes compared to sideswipe configurations was 6.29. The rate of driver fatality per one crash has also increased marginally over the years. The study findings provide some information to support the recommendation that a full-width configuration is considered in future ASEAN NCAP frontal crash tests. Further research is also needed to fully understand real-world frontal crash impacts in Malaysia.
基于马来西亚警方报告的正面碰撞事故对驾驶员伤害模式的分析
包括马来西亚在内的大多数东南亚国家涉及四轮车辆乘员的交通死亡人数相对较高。正面碰撞已被确定为大多数乘用车乘员死亡的原因。因此,需要更好地了解现实世界的正面碰撞,以支持未来正面碰撞测试项目的决策过程。研究的一个重要因素是基于真实碰撞的乘员伤害模式。此外,不同的正面碰撞配置可能导致不同程度的伤害严重程度。本研究的目的是分析基于马来西亚警方报告的正面碰撞事故的驾驶员损伤和身体部位损伤水平。2015年至2019年的道路交通事故案件来自马来西亚皇家警察(PDRM)武吉阿曼交通调查和执法部门(JSPT)。81%的案例包括正面碰撞(全宽度和偏移),而其余的案例涉及侧击。绝大多数司机未受伤(70.77%),而致死伤、重伤和重伤的比例分别为11.11%、8.77%和6.87%。司机中最常见的致命案例涉及两种配置的多个身体区域的伤害。卡方检验揭示了正面碰撞配置与驾驶员损伤水平之间的显著关联。正面碰撞与侧面碰撞的平均死亡率比值比为6.29。多年来,每次撞车事故的司机死亡率也略有上升。研究结果提供了一些信息,支持在未来东盟NCAP正面碰撞试验中考虑全宽度配置的建议。还需要进一步研究,以充分了解马来西亚现实世界的正面碰撞影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信