Contractual Relations with Participation of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations

N. Buzova
{"title":"Contractual Relations with Participation of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations","authors":"N. Buzova","doi":"10.17323/2713-2749.2021.3.77.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the creative industry, performers’ interests cannot be met solely through their own actions and the realization of their own creative abilities. Coordinated interaction of representatives of creative professions and show business is necessary. In this area, various kinds of agreements are concluded, which do not always relate to the exercise of intellectual rights. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation regulates in more detail the contractual relations associated with the use of works of authorship, without paying due attention to contracts with performers, producers of phonograms and broadcasting organizations, which leads to the problem of double interpretation in the process of law enforcement. Performers, producers of phonograms and broadcasting organizations conclude not only agreements on the disposal of exclusive rights, but also agreements on the distribution of remuneration for use, on the management of rights, and others.The article examines some types of civil contracts concerning the objects of related rights. Some contractual relations concerning related rights, both those named in Chapter 71 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and not named in it, but occurring in practice, are analyzed. A comparison is made of similar contractual relations concerning objects of copyright and objects of related rights. It is important to distinguish service contracts involving performers, phonogram producers, and broadcasting organizations from contracts for the exercise of intellectual rights. If in the contracts of the first group special attention deserves the beneficial effect achieved from the actions of the service provider, then","PeriodicalId":410740,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues in the Digital Age","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues in the Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2021.3.77.97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the creative industry, performers’ interests cannot be met solely through their own actions and the realization of their own creative abilities. Coordinated interaction of representatives of creative professions and show business is necessary. In this area, various kinds of agreements are concluded, which do not always relate to the exercise of intellectual rights. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation regulates in more detail the contractual relations associated with the use of works of authorship, without paying due attention to contracts with performers, producers of phonograms and broadcasting organizations, which leads to the problem of double interpretation in the process of law enforcement. Performers, producers of phonograms and broadcasting organizations conclude not only agreements on the disposal of exclusive rights, but also agreements on the distribution of remuneration for use, on the management of rights, and others.The article examines some types of civil contracts concerning the objects of related rights. Some contractual relations concerning related rights, both those named in Chapter 71 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, and not named in it, but occurring in practice, are analyzed. A comparison is made of similar contractual relations concerning objects of copyright and objects of related rights. It is important to distinguish service contracts involving performers, phonogram producers, and broadcasting organizations from contracts for the exercise of intellectual rights. If in the contracts of the first group special attention deserves the beneficial effect achieved from the actions of the service provider, then
表演者、录音制品制作者和广播组织参与的合同关系
在创意产业中,表演者的利益不能仅仅通过自己的行动和实现自己的创作能力来满足。创意行业和演艺界代表的协调互动是必要的。在这方面,缔结了各种协定,但这些协定并不总是与知识产权的行使有关。《俄罗斯联邦民法典》更详细地规定了与使用作者作品有关的合同关系,而没有适当注意与表演者、录音制品制作者和广播组织签订的合同,这导致了执法过程中的双重解释问题。表演者、录音制品制作者和广播组织不仅就专有权的处置达成协议,而且还就使用报酬的分配、权利的管理和其他方面达成协议。本文探讨了涉及关联权利客体的几种民事合同类型。本文分析了俄罗斯联邦民法典第71章规定的与相关权利有关的合同关系,以及在实践中发生的与相关权利有关的合同关系。比较了版权客体和相关权利客体的类似合同关系。区分涉及表演者、录音制品制作者和广播组织的服务合同与行使知识产权的合同是很重要的。如果在第一组合同中特别注意服务提供者的行为所取得的有益效果,那么
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信