E. Gregan, S. Keogh, T. Hedderman, B. McCarthy, Garrett F. Farrell, G. Chambers, H. Byrne
{"title":"Stokes/anti‐Stokes Raman Spectroscopy of HiPco Single‐Wall Carbon Nanotubes","authors":"E. Gregan, S. Keogh, T. Hedderman, B. McCarthy, Garrett F. Farrell, G. Chambers, H. Byrne","doi":"10.1063/1.1514126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An analysis of the Raman spectra of single‐walled HiPco carbon nanotube powder using laser energies of 1.92 eV, 2.4 eV, 2.5 eV and 2.7 eV, including a comparison of the Stokes and anti‐Stokes contributions is presented. The diameter distribution was determined to be 0.8 – 1.2 nm from the spectral positioning of the Radial Breathing Modes. The diameter distribution is consistent with that determined by NIR absorption spectroscopy. At all excitation energies the profile of the G‐line (≈ 1580cm−1) indicates a predominance of semiconducting tubes although at 2.4 eV there is some indication of some contribution from metallic tubes. In all cases the anti Stokes line was weak and the Stokes/anti Stokes ratio was at least an order of magnitude indicating at most weak resonance enhancement in either.","PeriodicalId":196292,"journal":{"name":"Structural and Electronic Properties of Molecular Nanostructures. XVI International Winterschool on Electronic Properties of Novel Materials","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural and Electronic Properties of Molecular Nanostructures. XVI International Winterschool on Electronic Properties of Novel Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1514126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
An analysis of the Raman spectra of single‐walled HiPco carbon nanotube powder using laser energies of 1.92 eV, 2.4 eV, 2.5 eV and 2.7 eV, including a comparison of the Stokes and anti‐Stokes contributions is presented. The diameter distribution was determined to be 0.8 – 1.2 nm from the spectral positioning of the Radial Breathing Modes. The diameter distribution is consistent with that determined by NIR absorption spectroscopy. At all excitation energies the profile of the G‐line (≈ 1580cm−1) indicates a predominance of semiconducting tubes although at 2.4 eV there is some indication of some contribution from metallic tubes. In all cases the anti Stokes line was weak and the Stokes/anti Stokes ratio was at least an order of magnitude indicating at most weak resonance enhancement in either.