Flight mishap prevention for UAVs

R.D. Colgren, T. Johnson
{"title":"Flight mishap prevention for UAVs","authors":"R.D. Colgren, T. Johnson","doi":"10.1109/AERO.2001.931244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For Uninhabited Air Vehicles (UAVs) to achieve operational levels of flight safety comparable to those of piloted aircraft, it is important to replicate the critical skills and predictive capabilities of the pilot to ensure proper flight mode selection and prioritization of tasking. Each individual combination of modes must be able to accommodate both predetermined as well as unanticipated causes of uncertainty. The system must adapt to these changes based on sensory inputs, as well as be robust against uncertainties that have not been sensed or directly measured by the system. The purpose of Technologies for Reliable Autonomous Control (TRAC), a joint Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company/General Electric/Jet Propulsion Laboratory mission management architecture, is to autonomously accomplish this complex mission and subsystem management task. To do this, it is desirable to provide \"outer-loop\" compensation for larger sources of disturbances that may require corrective maneuvers, mode switching, or changes to the command inputs to the flight control system. Flight Envelope Protection is one such feature. Based on our analysis of recent UAV data, emergency procedures account for about 26% of mishaps, while errors in operating procedures account for about 10% of mishaps. Thus, Flight Envelope Protection could prevent up to about 36% of mishaps. While there are many points of similarity between UAV Flight Envelope Protection (FEP) and FEP for manned aircraft, a number of new issues arise in the UAV case. Hence, this is not straightforward extension of existing techniques.","PeriodicalId":329225,"journal":{"name":"2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8542)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2001.931244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

For Uninhabited Air Vehicles (UAVs) to achieve operational levels of flight safety comparable to those of piloted aircraft, it is important to replicate the critical skills and predictive capabilities of the pilot to ensure proper flight mode selection and prioritization of tasking. Each individual combination of modes must be able to accommodate both predetermined as well as unanticipated causes of uncertainty. The system must adapt to these changes based on sensory inputs, as well as be robust against uncertainties that have not been sensed or directly measured by the system. The purpose of Technologies for Reliable Autonomous Control (TRAC), a joint Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company/General Electric/Jet Propulsion Laboratory mission management architecture, is to autonomously accomplish this complex mission and subsystem management task. To do this, it is desirable to provide "outer-loop" compensation for larger sources of disturbances that may require corrective maneuvers, mode switching, or changes to the command inputs to the flight control system. Flight Envelope Protection is one such feature. Based on our analysis of recent UAV data, emergency procedures account for about 26% of mishaps, while errors in operating procedures account for about 10% of mishaps. Thus, Flight Envelope Protection could prevent up to about 36% of mishaps. While there are many points of similarity between UAV Flight Envelope Protection (FEP) and FEP for manned aircraft, a number of new issues arise in the UAV case. Hence, this is not straightforward extension of existing techniques.
无人机飞行事故预防
对于无人飞行器(uav)来说,要实现与有人驾驶飞机相当的飞行安全操作水平,复制飞行员的关键技能和预测能力以确保正确的飞行模式选择和任务优先级是很重要的。每种模式的单独组合必须能够适应预先确定的和未预料到的不确定性原因。系统必须适应这些基于感官输入的变化,并对系统未感知或直接测量的不确定性具有鲁棒性。可靠自主控制技术(TRAC)是洛·马航空公司/通用电气/喷气推进实验室联合开发的任务管理架构,其目的是自主完成这一复杂的任务和子系统管理任务。要做到这一点,需要为较大的干扰源提供“外环”补偿,这些干扰源可能需要纠正机动、模式切换或改变飞行控制系统的命令输入。飞行包线保护就是这样一个功能。根据我们对近期无人机数据的分析,应急程序约占事故的26%,而操作程序错误约占事故的10%。因此,飞行包线保护可以防止高达36%的事故。虽然无人机飞行包线保护(FEP)与有人驾驶飞机的FEP有许多相似之处,但在无人机情况下出现了一些新的问题。因此,这不是对现有技术的直接扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信