Reflecting on four Living Labs in the Netherlands and Indonesia: a perspective on performance, public engagement and participation

L. Witteveen, J. Fliervoet, D. Roosmini, Paul van Eijk, Nurdahlia Lairing
{"title":"Reflecting on four Living Labs in the Netherlands and Indonesia: a perspective on performance, public engagement and participation","authors":"L. Witteveen, J. Fliervoet, D. Roosmini, Paul van Eijk, Nurdahlia Lairing","doi":"10.22323/2.22030201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nLiving Labs need to improve their performance to address urgent social and environmental sustainability challenges. A framework combining the dimensions of environment and focus, methods and collaborative action, and outcomes with a life cycle perspective allowed analysing four Living Labs in the Netherlands and Indonesia. These Living Labs present differences in environment but are similar for the focus on sustainability transition processes. The reflection reveals the importance of considering public engagement and participation needed to foster a responsible approach and a sustainable performance of Living Labs.","PeriodicalId":165630,"journal":{"name":"Special Issue: Living labs under construction: paradigms, practices, and perspectives of public science communication and participatory science","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Issue: Living labs under construction: paradigms, practices, and perspectives of public science communication and participatory science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22323/2.22030201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Living Labs need to improve their performance to address urgent social and environmental sustainability challenges. A framework combining the dimensions of environment and focus, methods and collaborative action, and outcomes with a life cycle perspective allowed analysing four Living Labs in the Netherlands and Indonesia. These Living Labs present differences in environment but are similar for the focus on sustainability transition processes. The reflection reveals the importance of considering public engagement and participation needed to foster a responsible approach and a sustainable performance of Living Labs.
反思荷兰和印度尼西亚的四个生活实验室:表现、公众参与和参与的视角
Living Labs需要提高绩效,以应对紧迫的社会和环境可持续性挑战。该框架结合了环境和重点、方法和协作行动的维度,以及生命周期视角的结果,可以分析荷兰和印度尼西亚的四个生活实验室。这些生活实验室在环境方面存在差异,但在可持续发展过渡过程方面是相似的。反思揭示了考虑公众参与和参与的重要性,这需要培养负责任的方法和生活实验室的可持续表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信