{"title":"Access as a substitute for holdings: false ideal, costly reality?","authors":"M. Line","doi":"10.1108/10650759510104989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argues that the much‐advocated switch from holdings to access has serious snags where current material is concerned. Libraries should discard most of their stock of older material and provide access to more current material. This requires the existence of a centralized collection of older material available to users.","PeriodicalId":448168,"journal":{"name":"Oclc Systems & Services","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oclc Systems & Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/10650759510104989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Argues that the much‐advocated switch from holdings to access has serious snags where current material is concerned. Libraries should discard most of their stock of older material and provide access to more current material. This requires the existence of a centralized collection of older material available to users.