Quality Assessment for National Libraries

E. Zimina
{"title":"Quality Assessment for National Libraries","authors":"E. Zimina","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2021-70-5-505-523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National libraries as well as any other progressive institutions have to assess the results of their performance. Depending on the type, functions, structure, areas of activities, organizational and financial methods, any national library can test wide sets of performance indicators consistent with its mission. Those indicators may differ from the indicators being tested by other national libraries. Quite often national libraries can also use additional indicators if financial/sponsoring organizations or target user groups etc. require this.The paper considers the methods and procedures for measuring quantitative indicators of national libraries’ performance according to the new international standard ISO 21248:2019 “Information and documentation: Quality assessment for national libraries”, which is partially based upon the ISO 11620:2008 standard “Information and documentation. Library performance indicators”. The author presents specific examples for calculating indicators using formulas and detailed description of steps for calculation of indicators depending on the library mission and goals. Along with qualitative indicators, the new standard recommends to use qualitative indicators to assess the impact of national libraries not only on their users, but also on society as a whole. In recent years, libraries have developed and probated methods to justify their importance. One of those methods is user surveying by means of special questionnaires made on the basis of ISO 16439:2014 standard “Information and documentation. Methods and procedures for assessing the impact of libraries” and circulated by libraries among their users to educe and differentiate interests of different user groups to provide them with subsequent target service.","PeriodicalId":325129,"journal":{"name":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2021-70-5-505-523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

National libraries as well as any other progressive institutions have to assess the results of their performance. Depending on the type, functions, structure, areas of activities, organizational and financial methods, any national library can test wide sets of performance indicators consistent with its mission. Those indicators may differ from the indicators being tested by other national libraries. Quite often national libraries can also use additional indicators if financial/sponsoring organizations or target user groups etc. require this.The paper considers the methods and procedures for measuring quantitative indicators of national libraries’ performance according to the new international standard ISO 21248:2019 “Information and documentation: Quality assessment for national libraries”, which is partially based upon the ISO 11620:2008 standard “Information and documentation. Library performance indicators”. The author presents specific examples for calculating indicators using formulas and detailed description of steps for calculation of indicators depending on the library mission and goals. Along with qualitative indicators, the new standard recommends to use qualitative indicators to assess the impact of national libraries not only on their users, but also on society as a whole. In recent years, libraries have developed and probated methods to justify their importance. One of those methods is user surveying by means of special questionnaires made on the basis of ISO 16439:2014 standard “Information and documentation. Methods and procedures for assessing the impact of libraries” and circulated by libraries among their users to educe and differentiate interests of different user groups to provide them with subsequent target service.
国家图书馆质量评估
国家图书馆以及任何其他进步的机构都必须评估其表现的结果。根据类型、功能、结构、活动领域、组织和财务方法的不同,任何国家图书馆都可以测试一系列与其使命相一致的绩效指标。这些指标可能与其他国家图书馆正在测试的指标不同。通常,如果财政/赞助组织或目标用户群体等要求,国家图书馆也可以使用额外的指标。根据新的国际标准ISO 21248:2019“信息和文献:国家图书馆质量评估”,本文考虑了衡量国家图书馆绩效定量指标的方法和程序,该标准部分基于ISO 11620:2008标准“信息和文献”。图书馆性能指标”。作者根据图书馆的使命和目标,给出了利用公式计算指标的具体实例,并详细描述了指标的计算步骤。除了定性指标外,新标准还建议使用定性指标来评估国家图书馆不仅对其用户,而且对整个社会的影响。近年来,图书馆已经开发并验证了证明其重要性的方法。其中一种方法是根据ISO 16439:2014标准“信息和文件”,通过特殊问卷调查的方式对用户进行调查。“评估图书馆影响”的方法和程序,并由图书馆在其用户中传播,以减少和区分不同用户群体的利益,为他们提供后续的目标服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信