In Search of Friction: A New Post-Phenomenological Lens to Analyze Human-Smartphone Interactions

Esther Keymolen
{"title":"In Search of Friction: A New Post-Phenomenological Lens to Analyze Human-Smartphone Interactions","authors":"Esther Keymolen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3690403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the key mediating role that smartphones play in everyday life, a postphenomenological analysis to better understand how we have power over these devices, how these artefacts empower and simultaneously can overpower us, seems highly relevant. This article will show that in order to engage in such a much-needed postphenomenological analysis, one will first have to address three fundamental, methodological challenges. The first challenge is brought forth by the personalized interface of smartphones, hindering postphenomenologists to unravel the so-called multistability of the device through variational analysis, which typically is an anchoring point in their analysis. The second challenge is that the networked ontology of smartphones disrupts the ideal-typical hermeneutic relationship end-users have with their smartphone. The third, closely related challenge comes with the general focus of postphenomenology on the everyday life, first-person experience of users which leaves many, significant stabilities hidden behind the smartphone’s interface. The hypothesis of this article is that some people may actually be in a position to look beyond the interface of their smartphones. Their every-day life experience of the smartphone differs from the experience of most smartphone owners because, amongst others, they are imbedded in a macroperception which allows them to bring to the fore what the design of the artefact may hide for others. However, our current postphenomenological lens is not equipped to catch these people with their deviating first-person experiences. This article will turn to critical constructivism to refocus the lens and identify these people. In order to then also include this variety of experiences in the postphenomenological analysis, I will suggest that postphenomenologists should not merely depend on already existing empirical research but also start collecting these experiences themselves by engaging in for instance interviews and focus groups with these identified people. Looking for the friction between these particular, deviating phenomenological experiences and the standard perception, should help us to establish where and how overpowering smartphones shape everyday life.","PeriodicalId":123735,"journal":{"name":"Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3690403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Considering the key mediating role that smartphones play in everyday life, a postphenomenological analysis to better understand how we have power over these devices, how these artefacts empower and simultaneously can overpower us, seems highly relevant. This article will show that in order to engage in such a much-needed postphenomenological analysis, one will first have to address three fundamental, methodological challenges. The first challenge is brought forth by the personalized interface of smartphones, hindering postphenomenologists to unravel the so-called multistability of the device through variational analysis, which typically is an anchoring point in their analysis. The second challenge is that the networked ontology of smartphones disrupts the ideal-typical hermeneutic relationship end-users have with their smartphone. The third, closely related challenge comes with the general focus of postphenomenology on the everyday life, first-person experience of users which leaves many, significant stabilities hidden behind the smartphone’s interface. The hypothesis of this article is that some people may actually be in a position to look beyond the interface of their smartphones. Their every-day life experience of the smartphone differs from the experience of most smartphone owners because, amongst others, they are imbedded in a macroperception which allows them to bring to the fore what the design of the artefact may hide for others. However, our current postphenomenological lens is not equipped to catch these people with their deviating first-person experiences. This article will turn to critical constructivism to refocus the lens and identify these people. In order to then also include this variety of experiences in the postphenomenological analysis, I will suggest that postphenomenologists should not merely depend on already existing empirical research but also start collecting these experiences themselves by engaging in for instance interviews and focus groups with these identified people. Looking for the friction between these particular, deviating phenomenological experiences and the standard perception, should help us to establish where and how overpowering smartphones shape everyday life.
寻找摩擦:一种新的后现象学视角来分析人类与智能手机的互动
考虑到智能手机在日常生活中扮演的关键中介角色,一种后现象学分析似乎非常重要,它可以更好地理解我们如何对这些设备拥有权力,这些人工制品如何赋予我们权力,同时又能压倒我们。本文将表明,为了进行这种急需的后现象学分析,人们首先必须解决三个基本的方法论挑战。第一个挑战来自智能手机的个性化界面,这阻碍了后现象学家通过变分分析来揭示所谓的设备的多稳定性,而变分分析通常是他们分析的一个锚点。第二个挑战是,智能手机的网络化本体破坏了终端用户与智能手机之间理想的典型解释性关系。第三个密切相关的挑战来自于后现象学对日常生活的普遍关注,即用户的第一人称体验,这在智能手机界面背后隐藏了许多重要的稳定性。这篇文章的假设是,有些人可能实际上处于一个超越智能手机界面的位置。他们对智能手机的日常生活体验与大多数智能手机用户的体验不同,因为在其他人当中,他们嵌入了一种宏观感知,这使得他们能够把人工制品的设计可能为其他人隐藏的东西放在前台。然而,我们目前的后现象学镜头并没有准备好捕捉这些偏离第一人称体验的人。本文将转向批判性建构主义,重新聚焦镜头并识别这些人。为了在后现象学分析中也包括这种不同的经验,我建议后现象学学者不应该仅仅依赖于已经存在的实证研究,还应该开始自己收集这些经验,例如,通过与这些已确定的人进行访谈和焦点小组讨论。寻找这些特殊的、偏离现象学经验与标准感知之间的摩擦,应该有助于我们确定强大的智能手机在哪里以及如何塑造日常生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信