The Defense against Antisemitism: Minor Victories, Major Defeats, 1890–1939

R. Levy
{"title":"The Defense against Antisemitism: Minor Victories, Major Defeats, 1890–1939","authors":"R. Levy","doi":"10.1515/9783110671995-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since I wrote this paper in the summer of 2018, I have found myself wondering if its title constitutes a just judgment on nearly 130 years of struggle by Jews and non-Jews to eliminate organized antisemitism. Surely, if I had subtitled it “Major Victories, Minor Defeats,” we would have to ask ourselves about the purpose of this great conference. Antisemitism, ever-changing, ever-threatening, is still very much with us. What I was wondering about instead was whether we can speak of even minor victories, and, more generally, whether the history of the fight against organized antisemitism during many decades has anything useful to teach us today. I believe that this history and both the victories and defeats are still instructive. First some clarifications, beginning with the coining of the term: I have not been able to find the use of the word antisemitism before 1860, when it was employed in a cultural rather than a political sense. By late 1879, the German journalist and political activist Wilhelm Marr seized upon the word antisemite as a way of distinguishing his political agenda from traditional Christian Judeophobia and from the commonplace prejudices of his day, thus hoping to give his views the aura of a scientifically derived truth, the product of his personal experience and historical research. Important to note about the early history of antisemitism is how rapidly what was essentially a neologism achieved the broadest currency. There must have existed a perceived need for a new word to describe the resurgence of conflicts between Jews and the peoples among whom they lived, fondly thought to be nearly overcome in this age of progress but which in fact were becoming ever more openly expressed. The need for a new word affected not just self-identified antisemites but Jews, non-Jewish critics, and neutral bystanders throughout Europe and wherever Europeans settled in the world. The word appeared in titles of books and pamphlets and on the mastheads of newspapers in English, French, Italian, Hungarian, Dutch, and Russian—all by 1894 and in places where no organized antisemitism existed, as well as where it was developing into fullfledged political movements. Even to outsiders, something new seemed to be agitating the vexed relations between Jews and others.1","PeriodicalId":219982,"journal":{"name":"Confronting Antisemitism through the Ages: A Historical Perspective","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Confronting Antisemitism through the Ages: A Historical Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110671995-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since I wrote this paper in the summer of 2018, I have found myself wondering if its title constitutes a just judgment on nearly 130 years of struggle by Jews and non-Jews to eliminate organized antisemitism. Surely, if I had subtitled it “Major Victories, Minor Defeats,” we would have to ask ourselves about the purpose of this great conference. Antisemitism, ever-changing, ever-threatening, is still very much with us. What I was wondering about instead was whether we can speak of even minor victories, and, more generally, whether the history of the fight against organized antisemitism during many decades has anything useful to teach us today. I believe that this history and both the victories and defeats are still instructive. First some clarifications, beginning with the coining of the term: I have not been able to find the use of the word antisemitism before 1860, when it was employed in a cultural rather than a political sense. By late 1879, the German journalist and political activist Wilhelm Marr seized upon the word antisemite as a way of distinguishing his political agenda from traditional Christian Judeophobia and from the commonplace prejudices of his day, thus hoping to give his views the aura of a scientifically derived truth, the product of his personal experience and historical research. Important to note about the early history of antisemitism is how rapidly what was essentially a neologism achieved the broadest currency. There must have existed a perceived need for a new word to describe the resurgence of conflicts between Jews and the peoples among whom they lived, fondly thought to be nearly overcome in this age of progress but which in fact were becoming ever more openly expressed. The need for a new word affected not just self-identified antisemites but Jews, non-Jewish critics, and neutral bystanders throughout Europe and wherever Europeans settled in the world. The word appeared in titles of books and pamphlets and on the mastheads of newspapers in English, French, Italian, Hungarian, Dutch, and Russian—all by 1894 and in places where no organized antisemitism existed, as well as where it was developing into fullfledged political movements. Even to outsiders, something new seemed to be agitating the vexed relations between Jews and others.1
反对反犹主义:小胜利,大失败,1890-1939
自从我在2018年夏天写了这篇文章以来,我发现自己在想,它的标题是否构成了对犹太人和非犹太人近130年来为消除有组织的反犹太主义而进行的斗争的公正判断。当然,如果我给它的副标题是“大胜利,小失败”,我们就不得不问自己,这次大会的目的是什么。反犹主义,不断变化,不断威胁,仍然与我们同在。相反,我想知道的是,我们是否可以谈论哪怕是微小的胜利,以及更广泛地说,几十年来与有组织的反犹主义作斗争的历史,是否对我们今天有什么有用的启示。我相信,这段历史,无论是胜利还是失败,仍然具有指导意义。首先澄清一下,从这个词的创造开始:我找不到1860年以前反犹太主义这个词的使用,当时它是在文化而不是政治意义上使用的。到1879年末,德国记者和政治活动家威廉·马尔(Wilhelm Marr)抓住反犹这个词,将其作为一种将其政治议程与传统的基督教犹太恐惧症以及当时常见的偏见区分开来的方式,从而希望赋予他的观点一种科学衍生真理的氛围,这是他个人经历和历史研究的产物。关于反犹主义的早期历史,值得注意的是,这个本质上是一个新词的东西是多么迅速地得到了广泛的传播。人们一定意识到需要一个新词来描述犹太人和他们生活在其中的民族之间的冲突,这些冲突在这个进步的时代被天真地认为几乎被克服了,但实际上却变得越来越公开地表达出来。对一个新词的需求不仅影响了自我认同的反犹主义者,还影响了整个欧洲以及欧洲人在世界各地定居的犹太人、非犹太评论家和中立的旁观者。这个词出现在书籍和小册子的标题上,也出现在英语、法语、意大利语、匈牙利语、荷兰语和俄语报纸的报头上——所有这些都是在1894年,在没有有组织的反犹主义存在的地方,以及在反犹主义发展成成熟的政治运动的地方。即使在外人看来,一些新的东西似乎正在搅动犹太人和其他民族之间令人烦恼的关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信