A Generalized Dynamic Transfer Function for Ultra-Tight Dual-Porosity Systems

Jingzhe Zhang, M. Raslan, Cheng Wu, K. Jessen
{"title":"A Generalized Dynamic Transfer Function for Ultra-Tight Dual-Porosity Systems","authors":"Jingzhe Zhang, M. Raslan, Cheng Wu, K. Jessen","doi":"10.2118/209324-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Warren and Root (1963) transfer function laid the foundation for describing the mass transfer between the matrix and fracture blocks in dual-porosity (DP) reservoir simulation. However, the pseudo steady-state (PSS) assumption imbedded in the approach of Warren and Root is no longer applicable when the duration of the transient state is prominent (tight oil or shale gas reservoirs). Lim and Aziz (1995) derived new shape factors in a framework that avoids the PSS assumption. However, similar to the formulation of Warren and Root, the approximation of Lim and Aziz fails to capture the pressure gradients inside matrix blocks for tight rocks with substantial characteristic times for mass transfer.\n In this paper, we introduce a generalized dynamic transfer function that can accurately predict the pressure response of ultra-tight DP formations. Based on the Vermeulen (1953) approximate solution, we first derive the new transfer function to model fluid flow for one, two, and three sets of perpendicular fractures where the matrix blocks are approximated by planar, cylindrical, and spherical geometries, respectively. Then, we apply it for rocks with anisotropic permeability. We extend our transfer function to represent more realistic geology by considering irregular-shaped matrix blocks. The proposed transfer function accounts for physical mechanisms at play in the reservoir and is applicable to describe different diffusion-type processes.\n Development and testing of the dynamic transfer function were done in the open-source environment of the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST). The implementation was validated using single-block DP calculations and fine grid single-porosity (SP) models. We report results from several examples covering a broad range of reservoir parameters. For comparison purposes, we also report the simulation results from a traditional transfer function, incorporating Lim and Aziz shape factors, in MRST and commercial simulators (CMG and ECLIPSE). We demonstrate that our proposed dynamic transfer function accurately predicts the pressure response across early and late times, while the traditional transfer function with Lim and Aziz shape factors can depart substantially from the true solution for ultra-tight DP reservoirs.","PeriodicalId":224766,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, April 27, 2022","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, April 27, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/209324-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Warren and Root (1963) transfer function laid the foundation for describing the mass transfer between the matrix and fracture blocks in dual-porosity (DP) reservoir simulation. However, the pseudo steady-state (PSS) assumption imbedded in the approach of Warren and Root is no longer applicable when the duration of the transient state is prominent (tight oil or shale gas reservoirs). Lim and Aziz (1995) derived new shape factors in a framework that avoids the PSS assumption. However, similar to the formulation of Warren and Root, the approximation of Lim and Aziz fails to capture the pressure gradients inside matrix blocks for tight rocks with substantial characteristic times for mass transfer. In this paper, we introduce a generalized dynamic transfer function that can accurately predict the pressure response of ultra-tight DP formations. Based on the Vermeulen (1953) approximate solution, we first derive the new transfer function to model fluid flow for one, two, and three sets of perpendicular fractures where the matrix blocks are approximated by planar, cylindrical, and spherical geometries, respectively. Then, we apply it for rocks with anisotropic permeability. We extend our transfer function to represent more realistic geology by considering irregular-shaped matrix blocks. The proposed transfer function accounts for physical mechanisms at play in the reservoir and is applicable to describe different diffusion-type processes. Development and testing of the dynamic transfer function were done in the open-source environment of the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST). The implementation was validated using single-block DP calculations and fine grid single-porosity (SP) models. We report results from several examples covering a broad range of reservoir parameters. For comparison purposes, we also report the simulation results from a traditional transfer function, incorporating Lim and Aziz shape factors, in MRST and commercial simulators (CMG and ECLIPSE). We demonstrate that our proposed dynamic transfer function accurately predicts the pressure response across early and late times, while the traditional transfer function with Lim and Aziz shape factors can depart substantially from the true solution for ultra-tight DP reservoirs.
超致密双孔隙系统的广义动态传递函数
Warren and Root(1963)传递函数为描述双重孔隙度(DP)油藏模拟中基质与裂缝块之间的传质奠定了基础。然而,当瞬态持续时间较长(致密油或页岩气储层)时,Warren和Root方法中嵌入的伪稳态(PSS)假设不再适用。Lim和Aziz(1995)在避免PSS假设的框架中推导了新的形状因子。然而,与Warren和Root的公式相似,Lim和Aziz的近似不能捕获具有大量传质特征时间的致密岩石的基质块内部压力梯度。本文引入了一种广义的动态传递函数,可以准确地预测超致密DP地层的压力响应。在Vermeulen(1953)近似解的基础上,我们首先推导了新的传递函数来模拟一组、两组和三组垂直裂缝的流体流动,其中矩阵块分别由平面、圆柱形和球面几何形状近似。然后,将其应用于具有各向异性渗透率的岩石。通过考虑不规则形状的矩阵块,我们扩展了传递函数以表示更真实的地质情况。所提出的传递函数解释了储层中起作用的物理机制,并适用于描述不同的扩散类型过程。动态传递函数的开发和测试是在MATLAB油藏模拟工具箱(MRST)的开源环境下完成的。通过单块DP计算和细网格单孔隙度(SP)模型验证了该方法的实现。我们报告了几个例子的结果,涵盖了广泛的油藏参数。为了比较,我们还报告了在MRST和商业模拟器(CMG和ECLIPSE)中采用传统传递函数(包含Lim和Aziz形状因子)的模拟结果。研究表明,本文提出的动态传递函数可以准确预测早期和晚期的压力响应,而传统的Lim和Aziz形状因子传递函数与超致密DP油藏的真实解存在很大差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信