Comparative study of routing protocols in MANET

Fihri Mohammed, Chahidi Badr, Ezzati Abdellah
{"title":"Comparative study of routing protocols in MANET","authors":"Fihri Mohammed, Chahidi Badr, Ezzati Abdellah","doi":"10.1109/NGNS.2014.6990244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In wired networks there are different physical devices routing the traffic centrally. By consequence, we can create paths in the network by using multiple management rules, but in Ad-Hoc network nodes this work must be done in an autonomous way. For that there are three types of routing protocol proactive, reactive and hybrid. The first one continuously calculates the possible paths to be available at the time of transmission. The second one creates the roads only when they are needed. And the last one is a combination between the two methods. In this study we will focus on three routing protocols AODV, OLSR and ZRP; and compare their performance in terms of loss packets and energy efficient.","PeriodicalId":138330,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Next Generation Networks and Services (NGNS)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Next Generation Networks and Services (NGNS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NGNS.2014.6990244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

In wired networks there are different physical devices routing the traffic centrally. By consequence, we can create paths in the network by using multiple management rules, but in Ad-Hoc network nodes this work must be done in an autonomous way. For that there are three types of routing protocol proactive, reactive and hybrid. The first one continuously calculates the possible paths to be available at the time of transmission. The second one creates the roads only when they are needed. And the last one is a combination between the two methods. In this study we will focus on three routing protocols AODV, OLSR and ZRP; and compare their performance in terms of loss packets and energy efficient.
MANET中路由协议的比较研究
在有线网络中,有不同的物理设备集中路由流量。因此,我们可以通过使用多个管理规则在网络中创建路径,但在Ad-Hoc网络节点中,这项工作必须以自主的方式完成。为此,有三种类型的路由协议:主动、被动和混合。第一个算法连续计算传输时可用的可能路径。第二种方法只在需要的时候建造道路。最后一个是两种方法的结合。在本研究中,我们将重点研究三种路由协议AODV, OLSR和ZRP;并比较它们在丢包和节能方面的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信