Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms

J. Liebeskind, Amalya L. Oliver, L. Zucker, M. Brewer
{"title":"Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms","authors":"J. Liebeskind, Amalya L. Oliver, L. Zucker, M. Brewer","doi":"10.3386/W5320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the organizational arrangements used by New Biotechnology Firms (NBFs) to source scientific knowledge. Using data from two highly successful NBFs, the paper shows that both firms relied principally on hierarchies and networks to source scientific knowledge; market arrangements were insignificant. Most interesting, each firm had a very large, diversified set of boundary-spanning collaborative research arrangements, mostly involving university scientists. It is argued that these external research networks enabled the two firms studied to compete more successfully in a highly turbulent and highly competitive industry environment.","PeriodicalId":169525,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation Networks (Topic)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1205","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation Networks (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W5320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1205

Abstract

This paper examines the organizational arrangements used by New Biotechnology Firms (NBFs) to source scientific knowledge. Using data from two highly successful NBFs, the paper shows that both firms relied principally on hierarchies and networks to source scientific knowledge; market arrangements were insignificant. Most interesting, each firm had a very large, diversified set of boundary-spanning collaborative research arrangements, mostly involving university scientists. It is argued that these external research networks enabled the two firms studied to compete more successfully in a highly turbulent and highly competitive industry environment.
社会网络、学习与灵活性:新生物技术公司的科学知识采购
本文考察了新兴生物技术公司(nbf)获取科学知识的组织安排。本文利用两家非常成功的nbf的数据表明,这两家公司主要依靠等级制度和网络来获取科学知识;市场安排无足轻重。最有趣的是,每家公司都有一套非常庞大、多样化的跨界合作研究安排,其中大部分涉及大学科学家。有人认为,这些外部研究网络使所研究的两家公司能够在高度动荡和高度竞争的行业环境中更成功地竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信